VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789[10] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17/03/09 11:27:51pm
Author: nelly
Subject: Re: Beating = Rodding = Flogging
In reply to: Annonymous 's message, "Re: Beating = Rodding = Flogging" on 17/03/09 10:03:43am

The Susannah Wesley book was one I remember hearing quoted alot - the general idea that you should break your child's will. Horrible horrible. This probably had some bizarre theological basis about original sin and the devil etc.

Did anyone read the Guardian on Saturday. There was an article on the Jersey childrens homes and the abuse that went on in them. It seemed that allowing corporal punishment allowed other forms of abuse to go unnoticed.

Peter - "spare the rod and spoil the child" (you mention it in another post). When I was at school we had a teacher who told us to rephrase it and see what it meant. i.e you SHOULD spare the rod and SPOIL the child. Looking back I think he was being mischeivous but good on him !




>>It happened.
>
>We have to put into context it was legal at the time.
>It was also and still is promoted by a lot of US
>evangelicals.
>
>Whatever the rights or wrongs, you have to take into
>account that where a large group is advised on this
>sort of thing, whatever the group, there will be some
>in that group who are inherently abusive and they will
>take things to extremes and others may do so because
>they become over zealous.
>
>It did happen and was advocated at the time and I
>think maybe still, by writers like James Dobson. There
>was a clear idea of how it should be done proposed by
>such people. However, I was there, and saw many times,
>parents visibly carrying canes. One of my chief
>memories is of being in the manse and hearing a female
>child obviously being caned, and being told - or
>rather shouted at, 'GRATEFUL ACCEPTANCE!' Parents
>would regularly haul their offspring off for a sound
>beating. There was also a parenting book with some
>good mixed with some very dubious advice. One thing
>that I found concerning and upsetting was staying in a
>house with a fairly new mother and watching her spank
>her under one year old - albeit on the nappy.
>
>Some of this teaching had its roots in what is in
>Susanna Wesley's diaries.
>
>By the time I became a parent I was advised to replace
>this 'rod' with a wooden spoon. I did briefly, but it
>was not the best way for my children whatever the
>rights and wrongs.
>
>One of my children had real problems and even about
>eight or nine years ago there was advocacy of corporal
>punishment for a teenager when I sought advice on
>behaviour. It was totally and utterly innapropriate.
>
>The green parenting book was a strange document that
>wives of unsaved husbands were told to keep hidden.
>This always seemed absolutely wrong to me and I said
>so at the time.
>
>I have friends in the JA and this is why for this post
>I had better remain anonymous, but some have told me
>their children have been harmed by this period of time
>as will my own although they were not even ever in
>community. It is to the credit of those parents they
>recognise the mistakes of the time and take personal
>responsibility for them.
>
>To my concern, I recently witnessed a JA parent smack
>a child - I was more concerned, as in any but this
>day's context the action was reasonable, and this is a
>generally balanced and loving family, because of what
>such behaviour would lay the family open to. Social
>workers where we live are convinced and taught that
>any form of corporal punishment - even a light smack
>on the hand is abuse. I would guess it is still being
>taught but I have not asked and I would not call a
>parent who lightly smacks a child in reasonable
>circumstances abusive.
>
>I have met ex JA kids who remember being beaten and
>they are NOT positive about the experience usually.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.