Re: Luke is credible -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 25/06/10 6:24:20pm
Author: the artist formerly known as anon
Subject: Re: Luke is credible
In reply to: Peter Eveleigh 's message, "Luke is credible" on 25/06/10 5:30:46pm

Actually, I probably have more experience of the JA than you do peter and was in community for nearly a decade and a half .... Luke is not credible as he is not using his real name and cant even remember the surname or virtue name of a leader he lived with and "abused" him! he might as well call himself father christmas as he would be just as credible

>>I wish to echo what anon has just said. I also know
>>Tim well and do not believe this rubbish. None of my
>>contacts have ever heard of you, and a lot of the
>>things you say suggest that you do not know a lot
>>about the JA and that you have been nothing more than
>>a casual visitor. All the old school accusations that
>>you come out with are tiresome and do nothing for this
>>cause.
>
>I have been in personal contact with Luke (who, to his
>credit has a name on here, which I think speaks rather
>more about his bona fides than the many calling
>themselves anon)for some time and have no reason at
>all to doubt his involvement in the JA. We have mutual
>contacts in common.
>
>I sense an attempt by some here to discredit him just
>because his experiences have been so extreme as to
>make them sound incredible (literally). But isn't that
>always the case when something as nasty as this comes
>to light?
>
>I find him very credible, even though his experiences
>are very worrying, as I never came across anyone in
>the JA who I imagined would tolerate the kind of abuse
>Luke says he suffered.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Hello -- Barbara, 25/06/10 7:07:11pm
Re: Luke is credible -- Peter Eveleigh, 25/06/10 7:14:09pm
- Re: Luke is credible -- Anon, 25/06/10 9:00:35pm
  - Re: Luke is credible -- ANON, 25/06/10 9:02:35pm
    - Luke, mitty, BarBar -- the artist formerly known as anon, 25/06/10 9:06:10pm
      - Re: Luke, mitty, BarBar -- Another, 25/06/10 9:16:25pm
        Talk Sport -- Barbara, 25/06/10 9:18:43pm
        Re: Talk Sport -- Anon, 25/06/10 9:19:45pm
        Re: Talk Sport -- Barbara, 25/06/10 9:23:52pm
        Re: Talk Sport -- the artist formerly known as anon, 25/06/10 9:27:08pm
        Re: Talk Sport -- the artist formerly known as anon, 25/06/10 9:24:43pm

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>Actually, I probably have more experience of the JA >than you do peter and was in community for nearly a >decade and a half .... Luke is not credible as he is >not using his real name and cant even remember the >surname or virtue name of a leader he lived with and >"abused" him! he might as well call himself father >christmas as he would be just as credible > >>>I wish to echo what anon has just said. I also know >>>Tim well and do not believe this rubbish. None of my >>>contacts have ever heard of you, and a lot of the >>>things you say suggest that you do not know a lot >>>about the JA and that you have been nothing more than >>>a casual visitor. All the old school accusations that >>>you come out with are tiresome and do nothing for >this >>>cause. >> >>I have been in personal contact with Luke (who, to his >>credit has a name on here, which I think speaks rather >>more about his bona fides than the many calling >>themselves anon)for some time and have no reason at >>all to doubt his involvement in the JA. We have mutual >>contacts in common. >> >>I sense an attempt by some here to discredit him just >>because his experiences have been so extreme as to >>make them sound incredible (literally). But isn't that >>always the case when something as nasty as this comes >>to light? >> >>I find him very credible, even though his experiences >>are very worrying, as I never came across anyone in >>the JA who I imagined would tolerate the kind of abuse >>Luke says he suffered.
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.