Re: Corporal punishment and sado massochism -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 29/06/10 4:18:26pm
Author: Peter Eveleigh
Subject: Re: Corporal punishment and sado massochism
In reply to: Luke 's message, "Re: Corporal punishment and sado massochism" on 29/06/10 11:49:23am

>If you google child abuse in world war 2, the evidence
>is there, they evacuated children from London up north
>and children from newcastle to Kent to prevent
>interbreeding and running away.
>
>In the late 50s we had west Indian immigrants brought
>in to do the jobs, as our population was so low, so
>yes it did happen, this also goes into a theis I wrote
>on creation of man, but this is not about the ja, and
>is not the place to debate this, but it does reinforce
>child abuse theories, and the fact that the ja was run
>by the children of these abusers, and with these
>attitudes still prevalent in society>Yes, that is what
>I am talking about.

you are making massive leaps there. You cannot say that because of a low population in the 1950s institutions were advocating institutional rape during WW2 in order to get the populations up. It is plainly absurd (even if you overlook the fact that the dates don't work)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>>If you google child abuse in world war 2, the evidence >>is there, they evacuated children from London up north >>and children from newcastle to Kent to prevent >>interbreeding and running away. >> >>In the late 50s we had west Indian immigrants brought >>in to do the jobs, as our population was so low, so >>yes it did happen, this also goes into a theis I wrote >>on creation of man, but this is not about the ja, and >>is not the place to debate this, but it does reinforce >>child abuse theories, and the fact that the ja was run >>by the children of these abusers, and with these >>attitudes still prevalent in society>Yes, that is what >>I am talking about. > > >you are making massive leaps there. You cannot say >that because of a low population in the 1950s >institutions were advocating institutional rape during >WW2 in order to get the populations up. It is plainly >absurd (even if you overlook the fact that the dates >don't work)
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.