child protection -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 29/06/10 8:02:46pm
Author: Peter Eveleigh
Subject: child protection
In reply to: Barbara 's message, "Breaking the taboo" on 29/06/10 7:52:10pm

I re-read all my emails to you and I saw there that you got plenty of sympathy from me.

My objection to you banging on about your abuse when on a JA forum is that this place is for people who want to talk about the JA and almost nothing you write about has anything at all to do with them.

I am mystified that you spend so many day-time hours on a forum which has nothing to do with abuse, rather than posting on a survivors' forum.

I object to your suggestion that I am anti-survivors. You must surely know that if I work with child protection and with children who have been abused, I cannot be anti survivors. But rather than just deal with that fact, you turn it on its head and accuse me of being part of a ring which steals children for abuse.

I am not, categorically NOT against you because you were abused. I just object to you monopolising this forum with stuff which is irrelevant.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

click "Create a new forum" -- Peter Eveleigh, 29/06/10 8:40:08pm
- You are not going to drive me off this forum -- Barbara, 29/06/10 8:49:26pm
  - better to be irrelavant than ignored -- Peter Eveleigh, 29/06/10 8:57:23pm
    - So wide off the mark -- Barbara, 29/06/10 9:13:00pm
The JA re-abused abused people -- Barbara, 29/06/10 8:44:47pm
- we had a bond -- Peter Eveleigh, 29/06/10 8:51:32pm
  - Ask yourself that question -- Barbara, 29/06/10 8:54:49pm
    - no, re-read the emails -- Peter Eveleigh, 29/06/10 9:01:30pm
      - Post them then! -- Barbara, 29/06/10 9:07:45pm
        Re: Post them then! -- Peter Eveleigh, 29/06/10 9:24:24pm
        Nice try -- Barbara, 29/06/10 9:40:45pm
        Re: Nice try -- Peter Eveleigh, 29/06/10 9:50:11pm
        Another nice try -- Barbara, 29/06/10 10:08:25pm
        Peter's training -- Barbara, 29/06/10 10:13:02pm
        I am sorry Peter -- Barbara, 29/06/10 10:30:28pm
        Fruit and nut -- Peter Eveleigh, 29/06/10 10:55:45pm

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>I re-read all my emails to you and I saw there that >you got plenty of sympathy from me. > >My objection to you banging on about your abuse when >on a JA forum is that this place is for people who >want to talk about the JA and almost nothing you write >about has anything at all to do with them. > >I am mystified that you spend so many day-time hours >on a forum which has nothing to do with abuse, rather >than posting on a survivors' forum. > >I object to your suggestion that I am anti-survivors. >You must surely know that if I work with child >protection and with children who have been abused, I >cannot be anti survivors. But rather than just deal >with that fact, you turn it on its head and accuse me >of being part of a ring which steals children for >abuse. > >I am not, categorically NOT against you because you >were abused. I just object to you monopolising this >forum with stuff which is irrelevant.
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.