Re: Agape -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 9/06/10 9:18:25pm
Author: Peter Eveleigh
Subject: Re: Agape
In reply to: Luke 's message, "Re: Agape" on 9/06/10 8:21:16pm

yes, the exclusion of people was always rather cruel. I understood it in principle, but it would have been better to have a rule that they would not have agape on a night when someone was visiting, or not invite poeple on Agape night. But to exclude people who are staying with you is just not right, especially when they are fellow Christians, as the communion was never meant to be exclusive.

The JA used communion as a way of excluding people...a way of reinforcing their committedness. To exclude people from "the Lord's table" because they are mnot "committed" is blasphemy.

(and yes, it is entirely possible to know the bible and understand christian theology, despite my not being a christian)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Agape -- Luke, 9/06/10 9:24:43pm

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>yes, the exclusion of people was always rather cruel. >I understood it in principle, but it would have been >better to have a rule that they would not have agape >on a night when someone was visiting, or not invite >poeple on Agape night. But to exclude people who are >staying with you is just not right, especially when >they are fellow Christians, as the communion was never >meant to be exclusive. > >The JA used communion as a way of excluding people...a >way of reinforcing their committedness. To exclude >people from "the Lord's table" because they are mnot >"committed" is blasphemy. > >(and yes, it is entirely possible to know the bible >and understand christian theology, despite my not >being a christian)
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.