Re: anonymity -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14/05/10 7:01:58pm
Author: anon
Subject: Re: anonymity
In reply to: Peter Eveleigh 's message, "Re: anonymity" on 14/05/10 6:50:40pm

>>>Incidentally, you are of course perfectly entitled to
>>>your anonymity, but it is interesting how all the JAs
>>>here, apart from their PR man John Campbell, hide
>>>behind aliases (and even choose names which are
>>>easily confused with others - smoke and mirrors).
>>>
>>>Is not one of you willing to stand up and be counted?
>>>
>>>You may not like what I say, but at least I have the
>>>integrity to say it openly and honestly.
>>

actually, I already did call you on your honesty and integrity and I don't need to explain myself to you and its' not a question of guts either - just my point of view. The wonderful thing about this forum is that we can all say just what we think without the need to worry about the consequenses!!!! By the way, you seem to have read my earlier comments as designed to boost your already super inflated ego - they werent!!!! ha ha
>>funny coming from you, who so fiercely defended my
>>right to anonymity just recently. I have already tried
>>the stand up and be counted approach but decided its'
>>not for me in view of pressure from all sorts of
>>places. Its' easy for you to speak openly these days,
>>after all you have been away for 100 years and have
>>nothing better to do with your life!
>>
>>(and as for honesty and integrity - Pete Eveleigh??
>>Pleeeasee!)
>
>Always hard for a JA to understand anything which
>isn't black and white, so yes, it is perfectly
>possible for me to defend your right to anonymity
>while still thinking you a moral coward.
>
>Call me on my honesty and integrity when you have the
>guts to say who you are and can point out any lie I
>have ever told. Even Mick Temperate was man enough to
>admit that I hadn't been untruthful about the JA, just
>"unhelpful".

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: anonymity -- Peter Eveleigh, 14/05/10 7:12:07pm
- Re: anonymity -- anon, 14/05/10 7:18:28pm
  - Re: anonymity -- Peter Eveleigh, 14/05/10 7:38:50pm
    - Re: anonymity -- anon, 14/05/10 7:57:42pm
      - Re: anonymity -- Peter Eveleigh, 14/05/10 8:05:42pm
        Re: anonymity -- anon, 14/05/10 8:07:45pm
        Re: anonymity -- Peter Eveleigh, 14/05/10 8:54:31pm
        Re: anonymity -- anon, 14/05/10 10:26:39pm
        Re: anonymity -- Peter Eveleigh, 14/05/10 11:18:57pm
        Re: anonymity -- anon, 15/05/10 7:41:33am
        you have the last word -- Peter Eveleigh, 15/05/10 4:38:35pm
        Re: you have the last word -- anon, 15/05/10 7:24:17pm
        Re: you have the last word -- Name Change, 17/05/10 1:10:00pm
        Re: you have the last word -- anon, 17/05/10 1:49:48pm
        Re: you have the last word -- Name Change, 17/05/10 9:52:26pm
        Re: you have the last word -- anon, 17/05/10 10:28:15pm
        Re: you have the last word -- Name Change, 17/05/10 10:36:49pm
        Re: you have the last word -- anon, 17/05/10 11:22:57pm

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>>>>Incidentally, you are of course perfectly entitled >to >>>>your anonymity, but it is interesting how all the >JAs >>>>here, apart from their PR man John Campbell, hide >>>>behind aliases (and even choose names which are >>>>easily confused with others - smoke and mirrors). >>>> >>>>Is not one of you willing to stand up and be >counted? >>>> >>>>You may not like what I say, but at least I have the >>>>integrity to say it openly and honestly. >>> > >actually, I already did call you on your honesty and >integrity and I don't need to explain myself to you >and its' not a question of guts either - just my point >of view. The wonderful thing about this forum is that >we can all say just what we think without the need to >worry about the consequenses!!!! By the way, you >seem to have read my earlier comments as designed to >boost your already super inflated ego - they >werent!!!! ha ha >>>funny coming from you, who so fiercely defended my >>>right to anonymity just recently. I have already >tried >>>the stand up and be counted approach but decided its' >>>not for me in view of pressure from all sorts of >>>places. Its' easy for you to speak openly these days, >>>after all you have been away for 100 years and have >>>nothing better to do with your life! >>> >>>(and as for honesty and integrity - Pete Eveleigh?? >>>Pleeeasee!) >> >>Always hard for a JA to understand anything which >>isn't black and white, so yes, it is perfectly >>possible for me to defend your right to anonymity >>while still thinking you a moral coward. >> >>Call me on my honesty and integrity when you have the >>guts to say who you are and can point out any lie I >>have ever told. Even Mick Temperate was man enough to >>admit that I hadn't been untruthful about the JA, just >>"unhelpful".
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.