VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]5678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 25/05/10 8:40:23am
Author: Anon
Subject: Re: Orwellian nightmare in the UK
In reply to: Barbara 's message, "Orwellian nightmare in the UK" on 25/05/10 8:19:44am

As Nelly already said when he posted the link to the site about all this it looks great but isn't as good as the illuminati theories.
Again I fail to see exactly what this has to do with the JA and I'm not really bothered about conspiracy theories.





>Although it has 80,000 trainees in 36 cities, 18,000
>graduate members and enormous power, Common Purpose is
>largely unknown to the general public.
>
>It recruits and trains "leaders" to be loyal to the
>directives of Common Purpose and the EU, instead of to
>their own departments, which they then undermine or
>subvert, the NHS being an example.
>
>Common Purpose is identifying leaders in all levels of
>our government to assume power when our nation is
>replaced by the European Union, in what they call “the
>post democratic society.” They are learning to rule
>without regard to democracy, and will bring the EU
>police state home to every one of us.
>
>Common Purpose is also the glue that enables fraud to
>be committed across these government departments to
>reward pro European local politicians. Corrupt deals
>are enabled that put property or cash into their
>pockets by embezzling public assets.
>
>It has members in the NHS, BBC, the police, the legal
>profession, the church, many of Britain’s 7,000
>quangos, local councils, the Civil Service, government
>ministries, Parliament, and it controls many RDA's
>(Regional Development Agencies).
>
>Cressida Dick is the Common Purpose senior police
>officer who authorised the "Shoot to kill" policy
>without reference to Parliament, the law or the
>British Constitution. Jean de Menezes was one of the
>innocents who died as a result. Her shoot to kill
>policy still stands today.
>Common Purpose trained Janet Paraskeva, the Law
>Society's Chief Executive Officer. Surprising numbers
>of lawyers are CP members. It is no coincidence that
>justice is more expensive, more flawed and more
>corrupt. And no surprise the courts refused to uphold
>the law, when a challenge was made to the signing of
>the six EU treaties, which illegally abolish Britain's
>sovereignty.
>
>Common Purpose is backed by John Prescott's "Office of
>the Deputy Prime Minister" (ODPM), and its notional
>Chief Executive is Julia Middleton. The Head of the
>Civil Service Commission is a member
>
>It is close to controlling Plymouth City Council,
>where is has subverted the democratic process. Local
>people cannot get CP's corrupt activities published,
>because the editors of local papers are in CP, and
>refuse to let journalists publish the articles.
>
>CP started in 1985; in the 1990’s, with its members'
>cross departmental influence, it was involved with
>what then became the disasterous New Millennium Dome
>Company and the squandering of £800 million; it
>appears £300m of this was diverted into the web of
>quangos set up by CP. There is a fraud case over this,
>stalled in the courts thanks to CP's influence in the
>legal profession.
>
>Over £100 million of our money has been spend on CP
>courses alone, and its been hidden from the public,
>and members names are a guarded secret. It charges
>substantial figures for its courses. Matrix for
>example costs £3,950 plus VAT, and courses for the
>high flying ‘leader’ can be as much as £9,950 plus
>VAT. This money is ours, paid by government
>departments financing senior staff to become agents
>for CP, instead of loyal to their own jobs.
>
>Common Purpose (Ltd by guarantee, No. 2832875) is
>registered as charity No. 1023384. It describes itself
>as being involved in Adult education. Given it preys
>on the rich and powerful, charges expensive fees, and
>its aims are clearly power and control, its charity
>status stinks and should be revoked.
>
>Potential Common Purpose subjects are selected for
>training. Are they susceptible to being converted; are
>they in the right job, with the right colleagues and
>friends? Do they have power, influence and the control
>of money? If the candidate has some, or all of these
>key attributes, then the local Common Purpose Advisory
>Board decides if they can do the course.
>
>Common Purpose - training our future EU rulers -
>continued
>
>Trained leaders are encouraged to act as a network,
>enable other members' plans, and have meetings under
>the so called Chatham House rules. This effectively
>means their statements are not attributable to them,
>nor can attendees reveal information heard at a Common
>Purpose meeting.
>Council Officers are having secret meetings with, for
>example, property developer Common Purpose friends. No
>agendas and no minutes. Common Purpose Graduates from
>the public quango sectors such as the Regional
>Development Agencies attend, and have the power to
>award large sums of public money to projects.
>
>It is the worst national example of cronyism, closed
>contract bids, fraud and corruption. And unseen to the
>general public.
>
>Common Purpose undermines traditionally effective and
>efficient government departments with an overwhelming
>influx of new language, political correctness and
>management initiatives. The talk is of empowering
>communities, vision, worklessness, mainstreaming
>(sucking EU money into a project to sustain it),
>community empowerment, working partnership,
>regeneration and celebrating diversity etc etc.
>Documents appear about change, and reorganisation.
>
>As CP “leaders” become more senior they employ
>countless managers and bureaucrats. In time confusion
>rules, and things don’t seem to work properly.
>Management decisions are made that seem stupidly
>destructive. The organisation’s performance becomes
>sluggish. Undermining the NHS is Common Purpose’s
>biggest success so far, with bureaucrats outnumbering
>hospital staff three to one.
>
>David Cameron, who is pro Europe, uses the language of
>Common Purpose; he has appointed Ken Clarke, the most
>committed of the pro Europeans, in charge of his
>“Democracy Taskforce” - rather like putting the cat in
>charge of the safety of mice.
>
>Common Purpose specifically targets children from the
>age of 13, and more recently younger, for special
>leadership and citizenship training. Yes, it is active
>in schools, and again the average parent has no idea.
>
>People have contacted us to speak of their experiences
>with Common Purpose. A common theme is its all
>sweetness and light, until you fail to follow the
>direction set by the CP leadership.
>
>Then interesting things happen. Ladies in particular
>have been bullied at work, some have lost their jobs,
>some have become paranoid and depressed at the
>pressure from people ganging up on them.
>
>A typical story is a husband describing the decline in
>his wife from the time she becomes a Common Purpose
>graduate. Loss of sparkle, enthusiasm, anxious and
>‘changed’, and she initiated a divorce.
>
>Other Common Purpose people lie when they are
>challenged as to their involvement.
>
>Common Purpose candidates are given a two day
>residential course in which they are ‘trained’ in a
>closed residential environment, such as a small hotel.
> They are encouraged to reveal personal information
>about themselves, such as their likes, dislikes,
>ambitions and dreams. Discussions are then controlled
>by the course leaders. Some participants have likened
>this to Delphi technique or the application of group
>psychology such as Cognitive Dissonance or
>brainwashing.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.