Re: trainspotters -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 1/06/10 9:17:56pm
Author: Dave blessed (Just left reality)
Subject: Re: trainspotters
In reply to: the artist formerly known as anon. 's message, "Re: trainspotters" on 1/06/10 10:33:13am

>never heard of Foyles War or Spooks ..... sometimes I
>feel a bit out of touch. Interestingly when I came out
>of the JA,
>I didn't know who the PM was or even which party was
>in power. There are key historical events missing from
>my memories! I am enjoying the re-runs of All
>Creatures great and Small at the moment. Sky + is a
>fantastic invention.
>
>>As for the bill I never really liked that program, I'm

I have just left the ja, and intend on now watching tv, films, reading what I like and eat what I like, I hate the ja, they are evil
>>gutted that foyles war and spooks seem to have ended
>>though lol
>>
>>
>>>actually, they are casncelling the Bill which was far
>>>better than the JA ever was
>>>
>>>>>Interesting concept. Not sure that I agree that the
>>>>>analogy works. I like talking and discussing the JA
>>>>>but don't wish that iwas back there. Life is a lot
>>>>>easier there In some ways due to no money worries
>>etc
>>>>>but that would not get me back personally but each
>>to
>>>>>their own.
>>>>
>>>>There are no circumstances under which I would
>>rejoin!
>>>>
>>>>But I wouldn't have joined in the first place if I
>>>>hadn't been totally in love with the whole thing. It
>>>>is easy to forget that aspect - the things that
>>>>seduced us into it.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: trainspotters -- the artist formerly known as anon., 2/06/10 8:19:29am
Re: trainspotters -- nellyp, 2/06/10 4:38:32pm
Dave Blessed -- Peter Eveleigh, 8/06/10 7:15:02pm

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>>never heard of Foyles War or Spooks ..... sometimes I >>feel a bit out of touch. Interestingly when I came out >>of the JA, >>I didn't know who the PM was or even which party was >>in power. There are key historical events missing from >>my memories! I am enjoying the re-runs of All >>Creatures great and Small at the moment. Sky + is a >>fantastic invention. >> >>>As for the bill I never really liked that program, >I'm > >I have just left the ja, and intend on now watching >tv, films, reading what I like and eat what I like, I >hate the ja, they are evil >>>gutted that foyles war and spooks seem to have ended >>>though lol >>> >>> >>>>actually, they are casncelling the Bill which was >far >>>>better than the JA ever was >>>> >>>>>>Interesting concept. Not sure that I agree that >the >>>>>>analogy works. I like talking and discussing the >JA >>>>>>but don't wish that iwas back there. Life is a lot >>>>>>easier there In some ways due to no money worries >>>etc >>>>>>but that would not get me back personally but each >>>to >>>>>>their own. >>>>> >>>>>There are no circumstances under which I would >>>rejoin! >>>>> >>>>>But I wouldn't have joined in the first place if I >>>>>hadn't been totally in love with the whole thing. >It >>>>>is easy to forget that aspect - the things that >>>>>seduced us into it.
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.