VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6]78910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22/03/10 11:10:44am
Author: peaches/nelly
Subject: Re: John Smith's posting must not get buried
In reply to: John Smith 's message, "Re: John Smith's posting must not get buried" on 22/03/10 10:34:48am


are you sure - well he must they married soon after and had their first very quickly. But it is a while ago now and along way from where I am now thank goodness.
I assumed the family left because of it as I think everyone did. Strangely though I also remember the girl who was the victim in this singing on stage in one of the worship bands after the whole thing happened, although she left after as well.
Regarding what happened, the story put out was that an incident had happened in the kitchen at either Battle Centre or Spreading Flame but it was a one off.
Were you living there at the time?
It is the kind of thing groups like the ja feed off as it plays to all their imagined devil stuff - sex, women/ Eve the temptress, world sytem seeking to destroy them. Must have been a powerful time in that stange jesus army completely wierd way!!!


>>He was in the church already and already married with
>>a child. He was an elder either before this incident
>>or became one shortly after release from prison. He
>>was definitely "in the lord" when it happened.
>>The girls family had been around for a long time and
>>they left because of it.
>>My understanding was that it was not systematic
>>longterm abuse but a single incident.
>>(not that that makes it okay)
>
>Again my dear friend you have the wrong information he
>wasn't married at the time and the family didn't leave
>for that particular reason and your understanding that
>it was not systematic again is wrong believe me I know
>I was there.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.