VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6]78910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 29/03/10 9:22:25pm
Author: Peter Eveleigh
Subject: Re: Hollie Greig
In reply to: Barbara 's message, "Hollie Greig" on 29/03/10 10:10:21am

>You'd not be so complacent if it was your kids, I
>think.
>
> >href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_X0rlSGsRE">http:
>//www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_X0rlSGsRE

>
>Before you start hoisting folk like the Humanists onto
>a pedastal, you ought at least to have found out a
>little lit about them.


You see wickedness everywhere, Barbara. That explains why the God you have created is the way he is...and doubtless explains why the JA appealed to you when it did. I hated the way as JAs we used to always judge people outside, but I expect you were comfortable with that.

You can't dismiss every group in society just because "SOME" members are associated, in your mind at least, with your own particular bete noire.

YOu have banged on endlessly about these so-called secret courts of yours, without ever providing any tangible proof that they exist (or showing any credible link between them and the JA - presumably you have some reason for bringing them up here, on a JA-watch site?).

You use terms like "The Secret Family Courts" almost as if they are called that officially. It doesn't seem to occur to you that the more you use such terms, the more absurd you make the topic sound. If such things exist, is your approach doing anything other than making your accusations look less than credible?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.