the JA connection is a straw man -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 30/03/10 5:06:25pm
Author: Peter Eveleigh
Subject: the JA connection is a straw man
In reply to: Barbara 's message, "Hypocracy" on 29/03/10 11:42:56pm

>I could have asked you what the Humanists have to do
>with the JA, or some of the other topics you have
>brought up for discussion

you could have but you'd have been missing the point of the thread, which was people's differing perceptions of God.

The point is that while religious themes are clearly pertinent to a forum about a religious cult....your secret courts are COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT

You concocted a premise for linking the two by trashing Mick Temperate for not supporting your campaign, but anyone who claims to know the JA should have known that there was no way either he or the JA were ever going to support you....

....not because they are corrupt etc...but because they have NEVER, ever supported any campaign which wasn't directed by them and didn't feed into their group. You knew this, which makes your whole Mick Temperate rant thing a real straw man.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

God's work -- Barbara, 30/03/10 5:28:21pm
- God's Command -- Peter Eveleigh, 30/03/10 6:25:54pm
  - Re: God's Command -- anon, 30/03/10 6:41:08pm
    - ouch -- Peter Eveleigh, 30/03/10 6:49:31pm
      - Don't bother, I can speak well enough for myself -- Barbara, 30/03/10 6:54:04pm
        Re: Don't bother, I can speak well enough for myself -- Peter Eveleigh, 30/03/10 7:01:03pm
        Cowardice -- Barbara RICHARDS, 30/03/10 7:17:55pm
        anon -- Peter Eveleigh, 30/03/10 7:21:47pm
        Birth Certificate -- Barbara, 30/03/10 7:25:29pm
        Re: Birth Certificate -- Peter Eveleigh, 30/03/10 7:29:25pm
        Re: Birth Certificate -- anon, 30/03/10 7:31:24pm
        Did someone say something? -- Barbara, 30/03/10 7:54:18pm
        What would Jesus say? -- Peter Eveleigh, 30/03/10 7:56:00pm
        Re: What would Jesus say? -- anon, 30/03/10 8:00:43pm
        My name is Barbara -- Barbara, 30/03/10 8:03:04pm
        Re: My name is Barbara -- anon, 30/03/10 8:08:24pm
        Re: Cowardice -- Peter Eveleigh, 30/03/10 7:27:44pm
        Unbelievable arrogance -- Barbara, 30/03/10 7:44:22pm
        Re: Unbelievable arrogance -- anon, 30/03/10 7:48:23pm
        Is that so? -- Barbara, 30/03/10 7:57:04pm
        Re: Is that so? -- anon, 30/03/10 8:04:31pm
        incredibly naive -- Peter Eveleigh, 30/03/10 9:18:41pm
        Re: incredibly naive -- Anon, 30/03/10 10:17:07pm
        what's in a name? -- Peter Eveleigh, 30/03/10 10:30:59pm
        Re: Unbelievable arrogance -- Barry M, 18/04/10 7:12:30pm

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>>I could have asked you what the Humanists have to do >>with the JA, or some of the other topics you have >>brought up for discussion > >you could have but you'd have been missing the point >of the thread, which was people's differing >perceptions of God. > >The point is that while religious themes are clearly >pertinent to a forum about a religious cult....your >secret courts are COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT > >You concocted a premise for linking the two by >trashing Mick Temperate for not supporting your >campaign, but anyone who claims to know the JA should >have known that there was no way either he or the JA >were ever going to support you.... > >....not because they are corrupt etc...but because >they have NEVER, ever supported any campaign which >wasn't directed by them and didn't feed into their >group. You knew this, which makes your whole Mick >Temperate rant thing a real straw man.
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.