Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>I am in the business of protecting children. I don't >do it by writing nonsense on the web. I do it >practically by using the Safeguarding structures which >are in place. They may not be perfect but they do what >is possible. As I have said, I find the efforts of >social services and the courts very effective and >professional. I have been involved in goodness knows >how many referral, multi-agency cases, as a teacher of >statemented and looked after children, whose histories >are frequently the most troubled. > >It isn't hard to see why (with your background and >your apparent tendency to see everyone who disagrees >with you as conspiring against you) you think that the >courts and social services are all part of a massive >conspiracy, but when you then start claiming that >professional child-protection structures exist to >"kidnap" children and feed them into paedophile rings >run by judges, etc, people are inevitably going to >think that you have lost the plot. > >I know you think that your campaigns are doing good, >but you are not protecting kids by trying to demonise >the very people who are actively working to protect >children. If we didn't have social services and the >police and the courts to protect children, where the >hell would we be? > >Some children have to be taken away from "at-risk" >situations. I'd have thought that you of all people >would appreciate that? Children taken away from >abusive fathers are not being "kidnapped" or stolen. >And the courts have to protect identities, legally, so >confidentiality is paramount - but that doesn't make >them "secret". And if your display of irrational >behaviour here is anything to go by, I am not in the >least surprised that a judge threatened you with >contempt of court....and suspect that that is why you >hate certain judges and have made it your business to >trash their reputations. > >There may be something in the stuff you say, but you >are very definitely the worst person to be presenting >the evidence because you do not come across as >credible. I am sorry that this is because of your >past, and I do feel for the child that you were, but >it now means that I think you may actually be >endangering children, rather than helping them, by the >way you make the things you say sound like nothing >more than conspiracy theory promulgated by someone not >altogether healthy.
Choose Message Icon: None :-) Happy ;-) Wink :-D Joy :} Smirk <:-} Innocent ☮ Peace >:) Mischief B-) Shades <3 Heart |O Yawn <:P Sick >:-( Angry :~( Sad ? Question *!* Alert Thumbs Up Thumbs Down (!) Idea [Info] Info Oo. Talk [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.