Re: an empty house attracts squatters -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 4/04/10 3:44:58pm
Author: Name Change
Subject: Re: an empty house attracts squatters
In reply to: Peter Eveleigh 's message, "an empty house attracts squatters" on 4/04/10 2:19:04pm

Pete I am only saying that I have been fair in the fact that I have made comment that you are a dominant voice on here and sometimes it seems like you run the show. I am not saying that you should stop posting etc.

I am determind to speak my mind as strongly as you do and enjoy a strongly opinionated debate so will not wilt under the debate.

I do not wish to fall out with anyone on this site at all and hope that there will be at least mutual respect from everyone. (I do not believe that you have been disrespectful to anyone or bullied anyone)

>>I have no desire to gag you whatsoever, I am a
>>Christian as well and totally hate injustice.
>>
>>I have slated Pete on here before as I believe he is
>>to dominant a voice on this site.
>
>Is it JUST to slate someone because he is a dominant
>voice? If you don't like what I say, disagree with
>equal force of argument. Don't just trash me.
>
>What does too dominant mean, anyway? in this posting
>you say that people are free to say whatever they
>want, and do so unmoderated.
>
>I have been active on-and-off for years in order to
>keep this site going...and to try to keep it
>on-topic....so that there has rarely been a time when
>the JA has not had an opposition. Others come and go
>or lurk...and very generally say very little. That is
>their choice.
>
>But if you want me to be less dominant, everyone here,
>you have to speak up to balance things out, because I
>doubt I shall be going away. And if you don't want
>people to come on here using the site to talk about
>non-JA stuff, you have to be posting about the JA more
>....
>
>. . . because an empty house attracts squatters.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: an empty house attracts squatters -- Peter Eveleigh, 4/04/10 4:10:48pm

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>Pete I am only saying that I have been fair in the >fact that I have made comment that you are a dominant >voice on here and sometimes it seems like you run the >show. I am not saying that you should stop posting etc. > >I am determind to speak my mind as strongly as you do >and enjoy a strongly opinionated debate so will not >wilt under the debate. > >I do not wish to fall out with anyone on this site at >all and hope that there will be at least mutual >respect from everyone. (I do not believe that you have >been disrespectful to anyone or bullied anyone) > >>>I have no desire to gag you whatsoever, I am a >>>Christian as well and totally hate injustice. >>> >>>I have slated Pete on here before as I believe he is >>>to dominant a voice on this site. >> >>Is it JUST to slate someone because he is a dominant >>voice? If you don't like what I say, disagree with >>equal force of argument. Don't just trash me. >> >>What does too dominant mean, anyway? in this posting >>you say that people are free to say whatever they >>want, and do so unmoderated. >> >>I have been active on-and-off for years in order to >>keep this site going...and to try to keep it >>on-topic....so that there has rarely been a time when >>the JA has not had an opposition. Others come and go >>or lurk...and very generally say very little. That is >>their choice. >> >>But if you want me to be less dominant, everyone here, >>you have to speak up to balance things out, because I >>doubt I shall be going away. And if you don't want >>people to come on here using the site to talk about >>non-JA stuff, you have to be posting about the JA more >>.... >> >>. . . because an empty house attracts squatters.
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.