Re: Peter v The Troll? -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 26/10/06 10:09:20am
Author: The Hooded Claw
Subject: Re: Peter v The Troll?
In reply to: Laura 's message, "Peter v The Troll?" on 26/10/06 10:01:03am

That's two mentions of a troll on here. You have a soft spot for them or something?

You can surely see my point that this Gnasher seems to have been acting as an 'agent provocateur' for the JA, being dismissive of what have obviously been very distressing experiences for some people? If that's something that you are all happy with, then so am I.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Peter v The Troll? -- Laura, 26/10/06 11:02:48am
- Re: Peter v The Troll? -- Gnasher, 26/10/06 2:16:48pm
  - Re: Peter v The Troll? -- The Hooded Claw, 26/10/06 3:45:17pm
    - I will let it go -- Gnasher, 27/10/06 12:43:25am
      - Re: I will let it go -- The Hooded Claw, 27/10/06 8:45:59am
        witness -- Gnasher, 27/10/06 10:05:06am
        Re: witness -- Tom, 27/10/06 3:01:42pm
        Re: witness -- The Hooded Claw, 27/10/06 3:14:07pm
        Re: witness -- Tom, 27/10/06 3:46:28pm
        truth telling -- Gnasher, 27/10/06 4:52:35pm
        Re: truth telling -- Laura, 27/10/06 10:07:45pm
        apologies -- Gnasher, 28/10/06 12:48:49am
        Re: apologies -- Laura, 28/10/06 11:47:47am
        Re: apologies -- Gnasher, 28/10/06 12:16:38pm
        Re: apologies -- Laura, 28/10/06 12:26:25pm
        ! -- Gnasher, 28/10/06 12:39:47pm
        Re: ! -- Laura, 28/10/06 12:42:21pm
        Trolls -- Gnasher, 28/10/06 12:47:05pm
        Re: apologies -- The Hooded Claw, 28/10/06 9:30:32pm
        Important not to play down the real bad stuff by discrediting it with lies -- Gnasher, 29/10/06 2:01:00pm
        Re: Important not to play down the real bad stuff by discrediting it with lies -- The Hooded Claw, 29/10/06 4:35:27pm
        You weren't there, Claw, but you ignore those who were. -- Gnasher, 29/10/06 5:49:03pm
        Re: You weren't there, Claw, but you ignore those who were. -- The Hooded Claw, 29/10/06 6:16:03pm
        we cancel each other out -- Gnasher, 29/10/06 6:19:57pm
        Re: we cancel each other out -- Gnasher, 29/10/06 6:23:13pm
        Re: we cancel each other out -- The Hooded Claw, 29/10/06 6:37:52pm
        thanks -- Gnasher, 29/10/06 6:39:53pm
        Re: thanks -- daisy, 29/10/06 9:30:02pm
        Re: thanks -- The Hooded Claw, 30/10/06 5:56:37pm
        Re: thanks -- daisy, 30/10/06 7:45:14pm
        Re: You weren't there, Claw, but you ignore those who were. -- Laura, 29/10/06 9:09:49pm
        Re: You weren't there, Claw, but you ignore those who were. -- The Hooded Claw, 29/10/06 9:31:26pm
        Re: You weren't there, Claw, but you ignore those who were. -- Gnasher, 29/10/06 11:32:00pm
        Re: You weren't there, Claw, but you ignore those who were. -- The Hooded Claw, 30/10/06 5:03:45am
        naughty boy -- Gnasher, 30/10/06 8:06:09am
        Re: naughty boy -- The Hooded Claw, 30/10/06 9:55:06pm
        Re: witness -- Barbara, 4/11/06 10:03:56pm
        rodding children is wicked -- Gnasher, 5/11/06 1:27:32am
        Re: rodding children is wicked -- Mike (webmaster), 10/11/06 11:35:52pm
        Re: rodding children is wicked -- Gnasher, 11/11/06 1:21:26am
        Re: witness -- Tom, 5/11/06 12:03:59pm
        Barbara's version rings very true -- Gnasher, 5/11/06 12:58:45pm
        Re: Barbara's version rings very true -- Tom, 5/11/06 1:33:16pm
        again, Tom, you are not/were not the norm -- Gnasher, 5/11/06 1:41:53pm
        Re: again, Tom, you are not/were not the norm -- Tom, 5/11/06 1:54:30pm
        if you remember the 1960s you weren't there! -- Gnasher, 5/11/06 2:43:33pm
        Re: if you remember the 1960s you weren't there! -- Tom, 5/11/06 3:01:30pm
        My two penneth's worth -- Laura, 5/11/06 7:29:28pm
        Re: My two penneth's worth -- Tom, 5/11/06 8:50:20pm
        Re: My two penneth's worth -- Laura, 6/11/06 9:21:05am
        maybe Tom's was an experience of a different church to the one I was in? -- Gnasher, 6/11/06 9:49:49am
        Re: maybe Tom's was an experience of a different church to the one I was in? -- Laura, 6/11/06 10:32:20am
        Re: maybe Tom's was an experience of a different church to the one I was in? -- Tom, 6/11/06 8:29:51pm
        been there, Tom -- Gnasher, 6/11/06 9:43:44pm
        Re: been there, Tom -- Tom, 6/11/06 10:08:56pm
        Re: been there, Tom -- Gnasher, 6/11/06 10:59:06pm
        Re: been there, Tom -- Tom, 6/11/06 11:02:15pm
        Re: been there, Tom -- Gnasher, 6/11/06 11:07:37pm
        Re: been there, Tom -- Tom, 6/11/06 11:12:13pm
        community -- Gnasher, 6/11/06 11:17:44pm
        Re: community -- Tom, 6/11/06 11:20:56pm
        yes -- Gnasher, 6/11/06 11:23:06pm
        Re: yes -- Tom, 6/11/06 11:25:33pm
        zion visit -- Gnasher, 6/11/06 11:27:28pm
        Re: zion visit -- Tom, 6/11/06 11:33:32pm
        weedon -- Gnasher, 6/11/06 11:35:20pm
        Re: weedon -- Tom, 6/11/06 11:37:08pm
        nurse -- Gnasher, 6/11/06 11:38:01pm
        Re: nurse -- Tom, 6/11/06 11:41:31pm
        Re: nurse -- Gnasher, 6/11/06 11:42:58pm
        Re: nurse -- Tom, 6/11/06 11:45:45pm
        outing -- Gnasher, 6/11/06 11:47:51pm
        Re: outing -- Tom, 6/11/06 11:51:24pm
        Re: outing -- Gnasher, 6/11/06 11:53:06pm
        Re: outing -- Tom, 6/11/06 11:55:43pm
        Re: outing -- Gnasher, 6/11/06 11:56:19pm
        Re: maybe Tom's was an experience of a different church to the one I was in? -- Laura, 7/11/06 10:06:50am
        Re: witness -- Aardvark, 4/04/07 2:07:14pm

[ VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>That's two mentions of a troll on here. You have a >soft spot for them or something? > >You can surely see my point that this Gnasher seems to >have been acting as an 'agent provocateur' for the JA, >being dismissive of what have obviously been very >distressing experiences for some people? If that's >something that you are all happy with, then so am I.
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.