Friday, May 2, 2008 - New servers are in! Click-in for more info!
VoyForums

VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:30:31 02/26/07 Mon
Author: Ken
Subject: Re: toe up, or parallel?
In reply to: David Lake 's message, "Re: toe up, or parallel?" on 08:09:05 02/20/07 Tue

Actually, if you successfully employ the single axis setup (either NG or Graves) the set up and contact positions do actually mimic each other. That's the whole point of the Single Axis method. Just my opinion and experience from both playing and watching others swing with that method.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> [> Re: toe up, or parallel? -- David Lake, 14:52:55 02/26/07 Mon

Ken,

You are correct in that a single axis set-up position is much closer to impact position than a conventional set-up position. However, it still does not take into consideration the downward shaft deflection (toe droop), through impact nor the lowered right shoulder positioning throughout the downswing caused by normal swing dynamics.

Realistically, it is not possible to exactly mimic the impact position at address, and frankly, I do not believe that there is any particular benefit in trying to do so. The goal at address is comfort and confidence; and any address position that produces this for the individual golfer is fine.

David

[Edit]




[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.