I second this, when applied to his posts about fifties rock and roll - there is no bigger champion of this music and few more knowledgable.
But why does he have to persistently demean and belittle other peoples' musical tastes? He defines 'good taste' by reference to mutual dislikes, a very sad state of affairs.
Many might agree that Jackson deserves the label 'creep'. However, if today's media exposure and coverage had applied in decades past, think how Chuck Berry would have been all over it and the labels he would have attracted. To mention but one.
