| Subject: Re: New Buddy Holly Photo |
Author:
Dale (Hi Graham)
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: Tue February 06, 2018 15:53:47
In reply to:
Graham
's message, "Re: New Buddy Holly Photo" on Mon February 05, 2018 05:44:12
Hi
Not to put too fine a point on things, but one rule here is that there should be no personal attacks.
All I did was post my "gut feeling" opinion, which a what a great deal of all message boards of this type are based on.
If you have expertise in photography, or have superior knowledge of digital photo manipulation, then I would defer to your judgement.
If not, then I suggest that your opinion is just that, a contrary opinion.
As I said in my original post: If the original photographer, or his or her estate can be contacted, and real proof of the photo's legitimacy can be verified, then I will humbly admit that my skepticism is unfounded.
Until then I stand by my gut that there are just too many strange elements to the photo for it to be from a legitimate undoctored negative.
I hope your comment was not made just to provoke an argument.
As you know, that would be considered "trolling".
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
