Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>>Do you think that by >>adding some really cool characters, (like Ronnie), >>that they need to sacrifice a few characters to keep >>their character count down. For us, (who have been >>watching), all the characters have been easy to >>follow, but for someone just starting to watch it >>could be confusing. I think the logical choice might >>be Lauren. Although, Ronnie is different than Lauren, >>they kind of share a niche. I think it would be wrong >>to sacrifice a villain. The villain is an important >>role, and several make it even more fun. > >Jamey: > >I found myself nodding in approval at everything you >said in this post all the way up to the last portion, >which I have been kind enough to quote. Are you >suggesting that Lauren is a villain? If so, how? > >On another note, I think the true sign of a show that >can be successful is one that transcends political >persuasions, for lack of a better term. Personally, >I'd hate to watch a show that was too one-sided on >either part of the political spectrum. I wonder if >it's proper to be placing "Boston Public" under the >"liberal" or "conservative" column, though. People >aren't watching the show for its politics, and if they >are, well I don't know how much fun those people would >be in a social situation ...
Choose Message Icon: None :-) Happy ;-) Wink :-D Joy :} Smirk <:-} Innocent ☮ Peace >:) Mischief B-) Shades <3 Heart |O Yawn <:P Sick >:-( Angry :~( Sad ? Question *!* Alert Thumbs Up Thumbs Down (!) Idea [Info] Info Oo. Talk [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.