Friday, May 2, 2008 - New servers are in! Click-in for more info!
VoyForums

VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8]9 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:19:57 12/16/01 Sun
Author: Hobsonphile
Subject: I think both Clare and Jen are right
In reply to: Clare 's message, "Re: Let's try this again: Did Guber overreact?" on 23:30:50 12/15/01 Sat

Hey, all- I just wanted to delurk for a minute to put in my two cents. :)

I think Scott's reaction to "It's Our Town Too" was probably influenced by many factors, including legitimate PR concerns, some personal uneasiness with the subject matter, and his general temperament.

I think Scott takes his duty to maintain a positive public image for the school very seriously, and I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with that. I would worry about his competence as a VP if he wasn't concerned about seemingly trivial things like funding, PR, etc. And quite frankly, given how litigious the parents, students, and teachers of Winslow have shown themselves to be, I completely understand the sometimes overly rigid stance Scott takes on certain issues. I may not always agree with him, but I do think his motivations are basically good.

It's possible also that, whether because of his military background or a more basic generation gap, Scott is a little uneasy with homosexuality personally. _I_ am relatively at peace with homosexuality because I've been so frequently exposed to it. I've had several good friends over the years who were gay or lesbian. Then there were the gay men I met at Mom's art school... But a lot of good, smart people Scott's age are struggling with their ambivalence on the subject because it just wasn't talked about when they were growing up. This mild homophobia (I cringe a little bit when using that word, because it conjures up some very vicious images, and a far as I'm concerned, honest folks like Scott are a far cry from Matthew Sheppard's killers) isn't going to change overnight. However, I think Clare is right when she says that Scott's "hard line" approach seems to be tempered with some open-mindedness- when confronted with the possibility of Jeremy's homosexuality, Scott seemed sincerely concerned about doing the right thing. And that can only speak well to his personal character.

Finally, I think the strength of Scott's response reflected the basic volatility of his personality. He just plain HATES it when people are not entirely honest with him- he takes it as a personal afront. :) I don't think Dr. Harris was specifically plotting to pull the wool over Scott's eyes, but I think he did deliberately refrain from mentioning certain plot points in the play because he didn't want the admin to quash his idea. I can understand why Dr. Harris would do this, but I also think Scott was fully in his rights to be angry about it.

So anyway, enough of my rambles. I think the forces behind Scott's reaction were complex, just as everything else about the character is complex. This complexity is why I love him so much!

Cheers,
Steph

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-4
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.