And how would u comment on the 14th shoe size, Rita? -- Flambers Drugstore

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon, October 18 2004, 5:08:43
Author: Katerina
Subject: And how would u comment on the 14th shoe size, Rita?
In reply to: Margaret 's message, "Read only the first few lines and that was more than enough" on Sun, October 17 2004, 19:42:52

Although in "R vs F" Golubev said Fischer had size 45 and i can scan the part of the article to prove it but in the interview Fischer I heard once mentioned 47 and then 49.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: And how would u comment on the 14th shoe size, Rita? -- Peter van der Hoog, Mon, October 18 2004, 12:44:40
- Re: And how would u comment on the 14th shoe size, Rita? -- Katerina, Tue, October 19 2004, 2:52:56
- Myoko Watai in the role of "a happy fiancee" -- Todd, Sat, November 06 2004, 11:29:30
  - Re: Myoko Watai in the role of "a happy fiancee" -- Peter van der Hoog, Sat, November 06 2004, 13:09:36
    - Re: Myoko Watai in the role of "a happy fiancee" -- Katerina, Sun, November 07 2004, 1:55:25
    - It is very complicated -- Todd, Mon, November 08 2004, 5:33:52
  - She is trying to convice ppl that her marriage won't be fake -- Katerina, Sun, November 07 2004, 2:12:35
    - Re: She is trying to convice ppl that her marriage won't be fake -- Peter van der Hoog, Sun, November 07 2004, 3:52:23
      - Pretty cognitive. -- Katerina, Sun, November 07 2004, 4:23:02
      - One more link -- Katerina, Sun, November 07 2004, 9:46:01
        First Larry Parr left this link in google -- Todd, Mon, November 08 2004, 5:56:21
    - So what? -- Todd, Mon, November 08 2004, 5:17:32
      - As always -- Asteria, Wed, October 03 2007, 1:26:03
  - Lemme explain it to you -- Margaret, Sun, November 07 2004, 13:04:56
    - One more reason you missed! -- Todd, Mon, November 08 2004, 6:31:18
I don't think I will, Kate -- Margaret, Mon, October 18 2004, 15:46:49
- It was but -- Katerina, Tue, October 19 2004, 2:58:06
  - Re: It was but..... -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, October 19 2004, 7:30:43
    - No, no! -- Katerina, Tue, October 19 2004, 7:47:46
      - Re: No, no! -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, October 19 2004, 9:52:05
        Better choose this one! -- Todd, Wed, October 20 2004, 0:54:44
        I saw her old movie "Funny Girl" -- Katerina, Wed, October 20 2004, 4:06:20
    - Re: It was but..... -- Margaret, Tue, October 19 2004, 14:37:59
  - Re: It was but -- Margaret, Tue, October 19 2004, 13:30:24
    - To think I thought I covered all preposterous arguments -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, October 20 2004, 3:35:06
      - To analyse the fantasies is more interesting, don't u think so? -- Katerina, Wed, October 20 2004, 4:39:46
        No -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, October 20 2004, 6:35:16
        Re: No -- Katerina, Wed, October 20 2004, 7:00:13
        Re: No -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, October 20 2004, 9:20:15
        Ur attitude is the problem. -- Katerina, Wed, October 20 2004, 9:38:27
        My attitude is my attitude -- Peter van der Hoog, Thu, October 21 2004, 3:47:47
        According to Eric Bern -- Katerina, Thu, October 21 2004, 5:02:27
        Re: According to Eric Bern -- Peter van der Hoog, Thu, October 21 2004, 7:52:22
        Not the best way to avoid an "unpleasant" question. -- Katerina, Thu, October 21 2004, 9:36:28
        Must be another point I assume -- Margaret, Mon, October 25 2004, 14:40:02
        I don't think so -- Katerina, Tue, October 26 2004, 5:11:28
        Out of sight, out of mind..... -- Margaret, Sun, October 31 2004, 16:14:03
        Didn't u save any messages valuable for u, Rita? (NT) -- Katerina, Mon, November 01 2004, 9:00:48
        Maybe for psychologists, but not for me -- Margaret, Wed, October 20 2004, 13:27:45
        There're a lot of such ppl among professional writers, by the way (NT) -- Katerina, Thu, October 21 2004, 9:40:58
        And even more professional wankers(dick inside) -- Todd, Sun, October 24 2004, 10:06:12
        Poruchick came and vulgarized everything! (NT) -- Katerina, Mon, October 25 2004, 5:12:27

[ VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

* Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>Although in "R vs F" Golubev said Fischer had size 45 >and i can scan the part of the article to prove it but >in the interview Fischer I heard once mentioned 47 and >then 49.
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.