[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Friday, March 22, 07:58:12amLogin ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wednesday, March 13, 01:44:43pm
Author: ffc123
Author Host/IP: host86-167-67-201.range86-167.btcentralplus.com /
Subject: If you really want to do something about this there's no point just posting your view on this message board. Join the FST and express your opinion where it has some clout.
In reply to: Kason Joumas 's message, "A solution for the Khans to get the fans on side pretty much unconditionally" on Wednesday, March 13, 01:12:58pm

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


  • Sorry but why would safe standing be any cheaper than sitting given your essentially going to be taking up the same space? Granted it'll be cheaper than sitting at one of the sides but dont see why it would be cheaper say if it was at the back of the Hammy end rather than the seats in front. Secondly it isnt the same as when we started as you could move freely within the stand then and you cant now you are given a specific spot to stand in so you'd need a certain gradient to make sure a short person was able to see over a beanpole in front, in Germany that's not such an issue as the grounds tend to be much bigger but would be interesting how it would work at the Cottage with the stands currently as they are (probably better implemented in the Putney end due to gradient). Personally not against the idea of safe standing but its never going to bring back the way the old terraces where. (NT) -- other c, Wednesday, March 13, 03:19:22pm (NoHost/
  • The gradient in the hammy end is the same as it was before. They simply overlaid on the existing mound. The enclosure has the same gradient, in fact I,m sure that the old terracing remains underneath still. Only the Putney End was changed significantly. We would be in a better position than most to reintroduce some sort of standing, not that it will happen anytime soon.. (NT) -- Hammersmithender, Wednesday, March 13, 10:17:01pm (NoHost/

    Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
    Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
    * HTML allowed in marked fields.
    Message subject (required):

    Name (required):

      Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

      E-mail address (optional):

    Type your message here:

    Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

    Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT+0
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.