Click here for an easy and free way to help protect endangered habitat at The Rainforest Site! Non-profit ad by Voyager
VoyForums

VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]45678 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 03:40:14 02/15/10 Mon
Author: Tess
Subject: Mini-Reread for the Month of February, 2010: Claire and Lord John

This is my first time to host a Mini-Reread, so I hope that I've done things right.

The Relationship between Claire and Lord John

One aspect that draws me into Diana’s books is the way in which she depicts relationships between characters. Relationships are complex and fluid. People change and grow through age and experience, and the way that they interact with others does as well. One of the more fascinating depictions of relationships in the Outlander books is the one between Claire and Lord John. Their relationship exists greatly due to the connection each has with the other through Jamie, therefore, within a triangle.

Though they seem to have quite a bit in common, their interactions with one another are often complicated by jealousy and suspicion. What brings them together, their ties to Jamie, also keeps them apart in a way, causing the triangle to be incomplete. Both Claire and John have something unique that is shared with Jamie and not the other. For Claire, love, marriage, honesty, their child, create the solid line between her and Jamie. Between John and Jamie there is honor, the brotherhood of soldiers, friendship, and the illegitimate child of Jamie’s that John has taken to raise as his own which create the solid line connecting them. However, between John and Claire, there appears to have existed no connection apart from Jamie.


Reading Assignments:

LORD JOHN AND THE BROTHERHOOD OF THE BLADE, Chapter 21, ‘Cowardice,’ (hardback ed,) pp. 285 - 289.

VOYAGER, Chapter 48, ‘Moment of Grace.’

VOYAGER, Chapter 59, ‘In Which Much is Revealed.’

DRUMS OF AUTUMN, Chapter 26, ‘Plague and Pestilence,’ and Chapter 28, ‘Heated Conversation.’

DRUMS OF AUTUMN, Chapter 63, ‘Forgiveness.’ The conversation between Lord John and Claire.

AN ECHO IN THE BONE, Chapter 95, “Numbness.’



Discussion:

1) In BOTB, Lord John told Percy Wainwright about his humiliating encounter with Jamie and Claire in the woods in Scotland, when he was only sixteen. He spoke of it to Claire as well in VOYAGER. Claire’s comment to him was that he seemed to have forgiven Jamie for that encounter. Does it seem that Lord John held a grudge toward Claire for that night, out of proportion to her involvement in the events? Or was his evident resentment of her due to something else entirely?

2) Prior to Claire’s encounter with Lord John on the plague ship, Porpoise, when we only learn his identity after their encounter, we’ve seen him in the story as governor of Ardsmuir, and then briefly as Jamie’s sponsor at Helwater. At this point, we’re not yet aware of the friendship that had developed between the two men. What were your thoughts about the kind stranger before you learned his identity? What were your thoughts once you realized who he was?

3) In Chapter 59, ‘In Which Much is Revealed,’ Lord John and Claire have a very frank discussion about his connections with Jamie. What were your thoughts about John’s motives for revealing the existence of William to Claire? Was he trying to reassure her, or was it something else?

4) After Jamie and Claire have settled in the mountains of North Carolina, Lord John pays them a surprise visit, bringing his son William along with him. Claire finds herself the resentful caretaker of Lord John, who falls ill with the measles, while Jamie must depart for the Indian Village, taking young William with him. It seems out of her normal character for Claire to feel resentment toward a patient, but she does indeed find herself holding a grudge against John. Once Jamie is away, John and Claire have a very honest, if at times heated, confrontation about why he has come. What are your thoughts on how their time together as patient and caregiver, and the conversations they had, went toward forging a better understanding between them? How did you feel about John’s impromptu visit to the Ridge and the reason he gave for coming?

5) At the end of DRUMS, John and Claire part with a tentative acknowledgement of each one’s role as caretakers of those whom Jamie loves, perhaps a tentative liking for each other as well. The following two books sees the interaction mostly through letters and gifts. Claire still seems to harbor some mistrust of Lord John, particularly regarding his motives for sending Bobby Higgins to her for medical care. What were your thoughts about Claire’s suspicions in this circumstance, and about Jamie’s revelation of why he offered himself to John in thanks for taking care of William?

6) In AN ECHO IN THE BONE, John is in Philadelphia, seeking out medical help for his injured nephew Henry. He ponders the relationship between his nephew and his caretaker Mrs. Mercy Woodcock, which has plainly gone beyond the usual intimacy of a patient and nurse. He thinks of how this kind of attachment is common, and then when considering whether he himself has ever felt such a tendresse, he is startled that Claire Fraser suddenly comes to mind. In analyzing his feelings about her, he determines that it’s not really a tendresse that he has for her, but there is some sort of unsettling intimacy, though he is unsure why. He thinks perhaps it has something to do with his feelings for Jamie, and her knowledge of those feelings. It’s uncomfortable to contemplate, so he shoves those thoughts aside, focusing instead on her medical abilities.

Much later in the story, thinking Jamie dead and Claire in danger, John marries Claire in order to protect her as well as Fergus’ family, his last great service for Jamie Fraser.

What did you think of the gift of the medical chest John gave to Claire, as an indication of his understanding of her?

7) In one of the more controversial moments of the books, John and Claire awake after a long night in which both had been drinking and grieving Jamie’s death. Their alcohol-fueled vulnerable states led to a sexual encounter. Rather than bolting from one another, they have what is the most intimate conversation of their entire relationship. What was your reaction to this scene? Do you think their experiences during their brief marriage has changed anything in their relationship; do you think the triangle is now complete, with a solid line connecting John and Claire? What do you think John and Claire now share in their relationship that is separate from Jamie, if anything?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> Tess, thank you for the thought provoking selections. The evolution of this relationship is one my favorite aspects of the books. In response to some of your questions: >>>>> See inside>>> -- DawnW., 09:50:11 02/16/10 Tue

I think very little of John's resentment of Claire had to do with their first meeting. A teenaged John made an heroic (and foolish) attempt to kill a villain and save a fair lady. Given some distance from this humiliating disaster, John is wise enough to blame himself, but he is still dismayed that the situation (and the Frasers) so defied his conventional expectations. This meeting really set the stage for his on-going relationship with Jamie and Claire. They never fit into the boxes John's up-bringing said they should have. At Ardsmuir John marveled over and fell in love with Jamie's wit, impressive education and compassion. Later he is repeatedly amazed by Claire's dedication to her work, which he first acknowledged on the plague ship, and her intelligence, courage and directness. Jamie and Claire's ability to defy John's expectations is part of why they, together and separately, fascinate him. Still,when John was relating this first meeting to Percy it was easier to have hard feelings for Claire, long dead, than towards Jamie, who he loved completely! But John is never one to shirk blame.
Of course Claire was not dead. Meeting her with Jamie in Jamaica shocked John to his core. Here was Jamie (unexpected joy!), but he was married. And not to just any woman, it was "that woman". John recognized her and must have recalled the longing with which Jamie had spoken of her. The ensuing conversation between John and Claire was fascinating. (For my money the conversations between John and Claire have been the jewels of the series, with the post-coital discussion in Echo as the most exquisite of all.) Yes, John begrudged Claire her place in Jamie's life and heart but the feeling was mutual! John told Claire about Willie both to acknowledge (I wouldn't say "reassure") that he and Jamie were not lovers _and_ to stake his own claim to being a permanent part of Jamie's life. A part Claire did not share or even know about. Instant rivals staking claims and sizing each other up! Claire came away knowing that there was no sexual relationship between Jamie and John, but she wasn't thrilled about the prospect of sharing any of Jamie's affection with John. As for John, if he had harbored any hopes of a relationship beyond friendship with Jamie, Claire's appearance crushed it.
The conversation in DOA during John's visit to the Ridge moved the two into a tenative relationship of their own. Claire's devoted nursing and John's honesty and openess led them to a grudging respect and even admiration for each other. Trust grew. They were able to acknowledge each other's intelligence, bravery and basic decency. They began to put aside their jealousy. If I were John I'd have gone to the Ridge. He was in an emotional crisis and solved it the only way he could. I probably wouldn't have had the guts to admit the truth of my motives to Claire as he did!
That visit didn't allay all of Claire's suspicions of John and she never hesitated to let Jamie know she wasn't convinced of John's character--as when she raised concerns about Bobby Higgins and William. Jamie, however, never failed to defend John.
I see the events of Echo as cementing John and Claire's personal friendship. I would be very surprised to see Claire ever doubt John's character again. John chose her to save his beloved nephew and showed he respected and understood Claire as a woman and a physician. I imagine his uneasiness in contemplating his feelings for her as his nurse were complicated by the knowledge that she, as well as Jamie, held his life in her hands (by knowing his greatest secrets: his homosexuality, his love for Jamie and the true parentage of William.) Yet, he trusts her. The gift of the medical chest showed he understood her calling to heal would help save her from her despair over Jamie's death (as well as indicating his willingness for his wife to work). He'd first recognized Claire's devotion to her work and rescued her from despair on the Porpoise and he did so again in Echo. All of John's gifts were wonderful, but it was the gift of himself that fateful night tht pulled her back from the edge and made her consider the future again. Their conversation the next morning made me laugh out loud and *sigh*. (Diana's work is masterful!) They accepted each other as individuals, accepted each other's place in Jamie's life and, yes, they have a personal intimacy now that Jamie is no part of (and I don't mean the sex.) They have had a marriage, however short. They have given and recieved kindness, emotional support, and friendship as well as sex. They will tell Jamie about it, but the reality is their's alone.
John is part of the Fraser family as never before and I think, in time, they will all be closer than ever. John, as Percy observed, is a protector. He may as well be the Frasers' guardian angel. He saved Jamie from transportation and possible death, saved Brianna from herself, Claire from arrest, prosecution and likely self-destruction, Fergus and family from arrest and gave William a fine life (and an impressive inheritance to come). If the Frasers needed anything to make life on the Ridge easier, John saw they had it and he always gave the best, especially the best of himself. (Did I mention I am a fan of John's?!) His love of Jamie was his initial motivation for involvment with the family, but it isn't only Jamie he loves now, is it?

[ Edit | View ]





[> [> Love your comments DawnW. I am also a fan of John. So much of the series depends on the first meeting of John, Jamie and Claire. If John hadn't told his brother, Lord Melton, that Red Jamie spared his life then Jamie would have died at Culloden. I don't think Claire ever acknowledges that John's brother saved Jamie and all the years she has with him are a result of that act. When Roger finds out Jamie is alive, I don't think they cared who Lord Melton was or why Jamie was spared and returned to Lallybroch (not prison). Thank goodness for Lord Melton (even if he wasn't sure Jamie would survive with that leg injury.) -- MonicaW, 13:33:03 02/16/10 Tue


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Very good thought, Monica. I don't know that Claire ever acknowledged Melton and LJ for saving Jamie - did she even know? -- jayn, 17:45:02 02/16/10 Tue


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> I hope to see her meet (and treat) him in the next book. If she can heal him, I'm sure he'd think that was thanks enough. -- DawnW., 17:56:19 02/16/10 Tue


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Wow, Dawn, great analysis! I, too, adore LJ and enjoy reading "his own" books. -- Stargove, 14:23:53 02/16/10 Tue


[ Edit | View ]






[> Love your analysis of The Triangle. I am a BIG fan of John's also. His love for Jamie is his most redeeming quality -- BrandyC, 20:15:50 02/16/10 Tue


[ Edit | View ]





[> [> Meant to say DawnW loved you analysis...... -- BrandyC, 20:16:44 02/16/10 Tue


[ Edit | View ]






[> Here goes my 2 cent's worth. Gee, I wish I'd had reading assignments like this in school, I would have done way better *G*. >>>> -- jayn, 07:42:35 02/17/10 Wed

Before I begin answering I should say that I like LJ, he is my second favourite male in the series, and I have read and enjoy all the LJ books. Whether or not you like LJ, and whether or not you like and are familiar with his series will temper these answers.

I don’t believe that LJ actually did resent Claire for this encounter. He was distress by the English lady (recall he recognized her as a lady) whom he thought he was rescuing, but any resentment was for this English lady who betrayed her upbringing; he saw the fallen image, not the individual. I believe the only animosity LJ ever felt for Claire was due to Jamie’s loving her rather than him. I don’t think LJ really resented Claire terribly much at all, he was jealous of her to be sure, but I don’t think he resented her.

I have always liked LJ and was immediately glad that this stranger was him. My expectation was that he would help Jamie, first out of his situation re being a traitor and secondly with finding Ian. I was a little disappointed when Claire ‘jumped ship’ and left him but I was sure LJ would be back.

I am not terribly sure why LJ took it upon himself to tell Claire about William. Claire was on the verge of hysteria and LJ first thinks it is the shock of the murder and Jamie’s involvement but quickly realizes there is more going on here (I love Claire being in a ‘dead faint’ on the sofa). I suppose that LJ realizes Claire has seen them (LJ and Jamie) embrace and decides he had best explain their relationship. LJ’s first instinct would be that Claire would know him as Jamie’s jailor, not as his friend, and we don’t generally embrace our jailors. LJ may be concerned that Claire thinks poorly of him, he has no idea what Jamie may have told her. Also, LJ doesn’t now yet whether Claire know he is gay; I am not sure that LJ would worry about Claire’s misinterpreting the embrace as sexual/romantic; he is used to hiding his secret. I also don’t believe that making a claim on Jamie, or trying to hurt Claire is LJ’s motivation, I don’t believe LJ is that petty. LJ is shocked by Claire’s appearance (believing her to be dead) and perhaps doesn’t respond with as much aplomb as he normally shows.

I was very glad that Claire and LJ had time alone; almost as glad I was about Jamie and William’s time. After Claire knew LJ would recover she was able to speak more frankly than she could have had he been on his death-bed but at the same time LJ was still ill enough that Claire needed to be somewhat compassionate which perhaps tempered her words to him. For his part, LJ got to see Claire as more than Jamie’s wife, she is a ‘professional’, and a person in her own right, and at that a person with more intelligence and stamina than most women of that time and one who is more concerned with practicality than convention. Of course, LJ has already seen Claire working on the plague ship but not first-hand, and not directed to him. LJ admires this type of woman (Lucinda, Nessie). I believe this episode began what became a very strong, if not always comfortable, friendship. I believe LJ’s motives for bringing William were honest as he stated, just to let Jamie see his son; keep in mind that this was the only place he could realistically do so in respect to social conventions etc, a meeting in London or even an American city would be too formal and structured. One of my favourite scenes is when Claire watches the men play chess and swallows her jealously remembering Jamie will come to her bed – as LJ and Claire accept that they each have a part in Jamie’s life and fill a role the other doesn’t they can return to and increase their initial liking for one another (they did like each other on the ship before learning who the other was).

I thought Claire was being unusually suspicious about LJ and Bobby in a way that had little to do with Jamie (Claire sometime jumps too quickly to conclusions and to diagnosis, just because she’s usually right doesn’t mean she isn’t sometimes too quick). I believe Jamie told her about his offering himself not just to alleviate her mind re Bobby but also to partially explain why he can be so trusting of LJ even knowing what LJ ‘really wants’.

LJ is a caring, sensitive man who pays attention to detail. The medical chest was the best gift LJ could give Claire to show her that he loves her and cares about her. He honours her profession and wants Claire to know that, while this is a marriage of convenience, it can also be a marriage of people who have a base to grow on as friends. LJ wants to help Claire to heal, both for Jamie’s sake and for herself, and he also wants to show her to know that he wants to help her. LJ is sensitive enough to realize that diamonds and furs are not going to impress Claire, what the chest represents will, it is LJ’s unfortunate error to repeat Jamie’s gift but the motivation for giving that particular gift is much the same from both men, and I find that idea intriguing.

The relationship that developed between Claire and LJ to this point was based on respect, strengthened by mutually recognized love for Jamie (and for Bree and William as well). In the same way that LJ and Jamie each earlier recognized his ‘counter part’ (similar social standing within his own country, soldiers, leaders etc) and accept each other as gentlemen even though enemies, LJ and Claire have accepted each other as honorable people, intellectual equals and strong individuals. I think, and have always thought, that there is a part of LJ who loves Claire as a woman. (I have always thought that under different circumstances LJ might have lived a heterosexual life and been happy enough.) The drunken sex didn’t bother me at all; I just didn’t really care about it. The conversation, though, was wonderful and I wish it could have lasted longer or been repeated. I honestly believe that, had Jamie stayed dead, Claire and LJ could have grown content and even happy together as their raw grief faded. Now that Jamie has returned, and once the initial awkwardness has passed, I think that LJ and Claire can have a wonderful relationship of trust, shared history and mutual respect and caring much like life long friends or perhaps a brother/sister-in law situation. (Incidentally I don’t really see LJ and Jenny as has been suggested, not because of the practical bars but because I just don’t see their personalities meshing.) I don’t know how much longer LJ will manage to stay in America. I would like him to somehow settle on the Virginia plantation but whether that can happen given he is not likely to turn rebel remains to be seen. The new relationship between LJ, Jamie and Claire will be interesting, it will be difficult at first but I think these three people really do care for one another enough and are generous and honest enough with themselves and each other for a true and very deep relationship to develop (friendship is not enough of a word here). I am not concerned with Jamie’s reaction to the sex and/or marriage, he wouldn’t be bothered at all by the marriage realizing it was LJ’s only way to save Claire; he will need some time to get past the sex part but I think will realize it was much like his experience with Mary McNabb, a need for human touch, for love, not a betrayal by either of them.

[ Edit | View ]





[> [> Jayn, so true, friendship is not a strong enough word to describe the relationships here. They are friends, but family too. -- DawnW., 14:26:55 02/18/10 Thu


[ Edit | View ]






[> Wow - what a ton of thought-provoking questions, Tess. It should be an awesome discussion. -- Judie, 09:00:40 02/20/10 Sat


[ Edit | View ]










[> Great questions Tess! I am going to start with #3. Let me say that I wasn’t always a huge LJG person. The first time I read Voyager, I thought that his motives were somewhat selfish in telling Claire about Willie, as I really believe that Jamie should have told Claire, since it was Jamie’s to tell. But that being said, I think John was trying to tell Claire how things really were between him and Jamie. He knew what she had seen earlier in the evening and he wanted the truth to be known about him and Jamie’s friendship. -- LisaW, 20:57:48 02/23/10 Tue


[ Edit | View ]





[> [> Lisa...I have to admit that I wasn't initially that fond of LJG either...but in spite of my resistance, he grew on me, and now he is 'stuck.' (smile) OK, I am still working on my own thoughts about this discussion too (been busy in the real world), but I will reply to your comments>>> -- Tess, 13:09:08 02/24/10 Wed

Don't know if I will run out of room, so I am going inside just in case.

I agree with your comment that one of John's intentions was to set the record straight (no pun intended) about his relationship with Jamie. He was aware that Claire saw him in an embrace with Jamie, as he pulled out her fan & handed it to her. And we all know everything that she thinks shows on her face. John's a shrewd man; he saw exactly what she was thinking.

I do think John was responding a little to his own feelings of jealousy over Claire, claiming his own rights, as Dawn said above in her message. Perhaps he was a bit rash in telling Claire about William, rather than letting Jamie be the one to tell her. But he's an honest man, and once he started talking, he could be nothing but truthful with her. I also think that John wanted to make it clear to Claire that he was not about to remove himself from Jamie's life.

What impresses me about John in this exchange is that, while emotions are high for both of them, he doesn't try to say anything spiteful to Claire. He can see that she is in a position of particular vulnerability...of course, now that she obviously knows his secret, so is _he_...but John does not take advantage of her vulnerability. When Claire asks if Jamie loved Geneva, John gives her some reassurance about that, though I don't think it was intentional, but just his general honest nature.

[ Edit | View ]






[> great topic Tess - how does Shame play out? -- Andi B, 19:27:33 02/27/10 Sat

This was a great mini-read. Very thought provoking. I think that the original encounter between LJG and Claire was fraught with humiliation for both individuals. Jamie shamed John when he tried to protect Claire from "dangerous and barbarous Red Jamie," and then he shamed Claire by ripping her dress and baring her body to John and his men.

It seems to me that forever Claire and John's interactions carry this original shame as an undercurrent. It certainly complicates their relationships to Jamie. A triangle indeed!

In my opinion, Claire often projects her need to poses Jamie fully onto Lord John. She gave up her world (and she thought her daughter) in order to return to be with Jamie. To me it seems that she is overly threatened by John. She allows her insecurities and past shame to control her relationship with him rather than the facts at hand. John did not pursue a sexual relationship with Jamie when he desired one. He built a respectful relationship with Jamie that was based on both his love and respect for Jamie's personal boundaries.

It seems that John often is willing to help Jamie and his family, even Claire's daughter Bree, when they are in need. Claire is resentful of caring for John when his is ill and not to thrilled by Willie. In comparison John offers to play foil for Bree even after she threatens him, and ends up risking his life. Additionally in John's relationship with Bree he chooses to take the high moral road by insisting he can not marry Bree. I wonder often how Claire acknowledges and honors John's role with Bree while she was pregnant and at River Run.

Thus I have come to believe that Claire is more shamed and vulnerable with John because of their original encounter than she would have been if that had not been between them.

Andi

[ Edit | View ]












[ Contact Forum Admin ]






Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2012 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.