VoyForums

Support VoyForums by visiting our sponsor, www.PainEase.com.

Thursday, January 07, 08:53:54pm [ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 04/ 6/04 8:26pm
Author: The Prime Scrutinizer
Subject: Apathetic anachronisms

It is I, The Prime Scrutinizer.I have been abroad in the land of the compassion faschists; suffering psychic torment for the sake of you all. Let me share an observation with you all. The average tradeshow teamster likes to bitch and piss and moan (especially when he is on it!). There was a time when this forum was filled with the vigorous give and take of ideas as well as B.S. Having given out my fair share of the former as well as the latter; I am dismayed by the dearth of discourse on this site. If you have not the vigor to debate amongst yourselves; how will you affect those who CONTROL you? Que Sera Sera (spelling in question); whatever will be, will be. That is APATHY. Consider an individual or an organization that lacks a valid purpose; like the man (a teamster?) who delivered ice when iceboxes gave way to the refrigerator. That group or person is an ANACHRONISM. I say to you that UNIONISM has become an ANACHRONISM; and that your piece of it has grown APATHETIC. That makes every mother's son of you APATHETIC ANACHRONISMS. Get fired up! Otherwise tuck your tails under in shame and find a normal job. At least get some chatter going, Shitheads! Yours in Brotherly wisdom, TPS

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Re: Apathetic anachronisms -- No name, 04/ 7/04 4:07pm

What are faschists?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[Edit]
[> Re: Apathetic anachronisms -- No name, 04/ 8/04 10:26am

Until you walk a mile in an individuals shoes, who the hell are you to say he lacks a valid purpose. Even then, does the purchase of a home mean more than a six pack?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[Edit]
[> [> Re: Apathetic anachronisms -- No name, 04/26/04 7:54am

I just meant that the spelling is FASCISTS.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[Edit]

[> Re: Apathetic anachronisms -- No name, 04/ 8/04 10:27am

Until you walk a mile in an individuals shoes, who the hell are you to say he lacks a valid purpose. Even then, does the purchase of a home mean more than a six pack?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[Edit]
[> [> Re: Apathetic anachronisms -- No name, 04/12/04 9:38am

Pathetic and boring, wow.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[Edit]

[> [> [> Re: Apathetic anachronisms -- The Prime Scritinizer, 04/25/04 4:17pm

It is I, The Prime Scrutinizer. I have been abroad in the land of the compassion faschists; suffering psychic torment for the sake of you all. One of you has requested that I provide a definition of the word "Faschist". This is a good query which I am happy to oblige. Rather than parrot the dictionary definition; allow me to define faschism by it's charachteristics. At the beginning of the twentieth century; nations (the powerful ones) were governed by constitutional monarchies. Our democratic system was a new and unproven system. The domestic and colonial injustices (by today's standards) of these monarchies created fertile ground from which sprang the twin (but supposed opposite) ideology's of communism/socialism and faschism; both of which are totalitarian in nature. The first is organized around a political or ethnic identity. The second is organized around a social or humanistic world view. Both systems are enforced with a brutally total control structure. Thus; Nazism is indestinguishable from communism or for that matter, liberalism. All should be vigorously opposed wherever the raise their ugly heads. Yours in Brotherly Wisdom, TPS

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[Edit]

[> [> [> [> Re: Apathetic anachronisms -- The Prime Scrote-itcher, 04/26/04 7:50pm

F.O.A.D.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[Edit]

[> Sanctimonious authoritarianism -- A Concerned Brother, 05/ 5/04 5:22am

Before anyone takes umbrage at what I'm about to say, let me explain that The Prime Scrutinizer is the type of person who would shoot you just to see if his gun worked. Read on, gentle reader, and hear what I have to say. I want to protect our peace, privacy, and safety. That may seem simple enough, but The Prime Scrutinizer complains a lot. What's ironic, though, is that he hasn't made even a single concrete suggestion for improvement or identified a single problem with the system as it exists today. He managed to convince a bunch of unsympathetic bohemians to help him make incorrect leaps of logic. What was the quid pro quo there? One might as well ask, "Is it possible for those who defend brutal antiheroism to make their defense look more unprofessional than it currently is?" To turn that question around, why does he think that he holds a universal license that allows him to bury our heritage, our traditions, and our culture? We should be able to look into our own souls for the answer. If we do, I suspect we'll find that griping about The Prime Scrutinizer will not make him stop trying to bombard us with an endless array of hate literature. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to convince people that their peers are already riding the The Prime Scrutinizer bandwagon and will think ill of them if they don't climb aboard, too. You may not be aware of this, but I want nothing more -- or less -- than to enlighten the mind of Man and improve him as a rational, moral, and social being. To that task I have consecrated my life, and I invite you to do likewise. I could tell The Prime Scrutinizer that he personifies our nation's short attention span and penchant for apathy, although he obviously doesn't care. I could tell him that those of us whose minds are not narcotized still remember his frequent outbreaks of savagery, but he wouldn't believe me. He probably also doesn't care that he uses the word "literally" when he means "metaphorically". So let me appeal to whatever small semblance of reason The Prime Scrutinizer may be capable of when I tell him that I oppose his commentaries because they are self-deceiving. I oppose them because they are stupid. And I oppose them because they will palliate and excuse the atrocities of his intimates in the coming days.

I feel this way because he should clarify his point, so people like you and me can tell what the heck he's talking about. Without clarification, his initiatives sound lofty and include some emotionally charged words but don't really seem to make any sense. This may be a foregone conclusion, but we could opt to sit back and let The Prime Scrutinizer reap a whirlwind of destroyed marriages, damaged children, and, quite possibly, a globe-wide expression of incurable sexually transmitted diseases. Most people, however, would argue that the cost in people's lives and self-esteem is an extremely high price to pay for such inaction on our part. He holds onto power like the eunuch mandarins of the Forbidden City -- sterile obstacles to progress who display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations.

Sanctimonious authoritarianism is the shadow cast on society by The Prime Scrutinizer's deeds, and as long as this is so, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance. For heaven's sake, every time The Prime Scrutinizer gets caught trying to test another formula for silencing serious opposition, he promises he'll never do so again. Subsequently, his emissaries always jump in and explain that he really shouldn't be blamed even if he does, because, as they insist, his communications enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness. You're probably thinking, "The Prime Scrutinizer feels no guilt for any of the harm he's caused." Well, you're right. But something else you should know is that I don't want to build castles in the air. I don't want to plan things that I can't yet implement. But I do want to overcome the obstacles that people like The Prime Scrutinizer establish, because doing so clearly demonstrates how if we don't cast a gimlet eye on his attitudes right now, then The Prime Scrutinizer's litanies will soon start to metastasize until they make bribery legal and part of business as usual. Let me leave you with one last thought: I am not suggesting government censorship of The Prime Scrutinizer's misguided orations.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[Edit]

[ VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
 * Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
 * HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (optional):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.