Create a New Forum Owner Login Contribute & Create Your Member account VoyUser Login (see contribute) VoyForums Directory/Categories No-ads: Completely remove ads from your forum VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News Help Desk VoyForums Exchange FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions Search VoyForums

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Not just that, but seen photos of big name dresses on their own Facebook pages being used for advertising where the fabric has obviousls shifted during the embroidery so outlines are clearly WAY off from rest of design, yet it has been made up and stoned and going out as a finished dress. I wouldn't DARE! Yet people are waxing lyrical about the amazing design?! Author: ugh [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: Monday, February 27, 05:57:35am In reply to: SNDM 's message, "Fitting." on Monday, February 27, 04:59:24am [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date If it looks good on stage from 30 feet away, and the clients are happy, don't hate! (NT) ; ) Monday, February 27, 01:42:04pm Point taken and I try to communicate this to my customers as well. However, it's the double standard that's frustrating (NT) -- dontcha' think?, Monday, February 27, 01:47:29pm To be honest, I've rarely encountered a double standard. Most dancers want a dress they can breath in that makes their waist look small & their figures look nice. Beyond that, few care. The ones that do came to a small dressmaker *because* they care and know they can't get that from a BNDM without alterations. (NT) -- everyone's clients are different though, Tuesday, February 28, 10:08:18am I agree, not really a double standard at all, just some people care more than others about certain aspects of dressmaking, like whether or not there is a pucker at the bust. Most just simply want a brilliant stage costume that fits reasonably well, and who wouldn't agree with that (NT) -- ?!, Saturday, March 03, 07:56:26pm