|
|
|
|
|
| [ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3 ] |
| Subject: Re: Grand Ocean Hotel | |
Author: Grit | [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] Date Posted: 15:08:42 03/20/07 Tue In reply to: Greg 's message, "Re: Grand Ocean Hotel" on 09:25:01 03/20/07 Tue I reckon the two I gave were probably the most important. However, for the sake of those viewing who may not have been in Saltdean at the time, I'm willing to hear the rest of them reprised. So, please proceed. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Grand Ocean Hotel | |
|
Author: Greg [Edit] |
Date Posted: 07:40:13 03/21/07 Wed I spent a good deal of time trying to stop the use for the hotel by asylum seekers. I am afraid that after 4 years I am not going to cover old ground again just for you to come up with some half arsed arguments. I suggest a hobby such as train spotting would keep you amused rather than spending hours debating a 4 year old non event. With regard to your comments about retired people, I would suggest they will not be milling around in groups, they will be far to busy knitting and having afternoon naps! |
| [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Grand Ocean Hotel | |
|
Author: Grit [Edit] |
Date Posted: 09:58:04 03/21/07 Wed So, you complain that the two reasons I advanced were not good enough, but won't advance any others, except you feared at the time that asylum seekers would mill around 'in groups' - just like the local teenagers! You start to debate Stephen's post, but have now gone off in a huff as you don't wish to '...cover old ground...'. The point about the impact on local resources is an important one, as additional hundreds of elderly people will most certainly pressurise local primary care facilities. |
| [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Grand Ocean Hotel | |
|
Author: Greg [Edit] |
Date Posted: 08:14:25 03/22/07 Thu I'm afraid I haven't gone of in a huff, I just find you very boring and have better things to do. The asylum debate went on for months and took lots of time. I don't now wish to cover it again in depth and would prefer to summarise it by saying asylum seeker hotel = bad thing for Saltdean, flat regeneration = good thing (should be!. If thats okay with you. |
| [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Grand Ocean Hotel | |
|
Author: Grit [Edit] |
Date Posted: 09:46:29 03/22/07 Thu It's certainly what I expected you to say. Stephen was simply illustrating that many of the arguments used against the asylum proposal could equally be used against the current proposed influx of new people. You have not demonstrated that those arguments could not be used legitimately now... But, I guess, that's OK with you. So far, Stephen wins... |
| [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Grand Ocean Hotel | |
|
Author: Greg [Edit] |
Date Posted: 02:07:17 03/23/07 Fri I suggest you go and have a look at the plans if I was you. No asylum seekers causing major problems, but nice new flats for mainly working family's. Probably causing a few problems buy hey nothings perfect. If I was childish to get into who wins I would say Saltdean, but I'm not that childish. |
| [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Grand Ocean Hotel | |
|
Author: Grit [Edit] |
Date Posted: 04:08:14 03/23/07 Fri I rest my case. |
|
Forum timezone: GMT-8 VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB: Before posting please read our privacy policy. VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems. Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved. |