Create a New Forum Owner Login Contribute & Create Your Member account VoyUser Login (see contribute) VoyForums Directory/Categories No-ads: Completely remove ads from your forum VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News Help Desk VoyForums Exchange FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions Search VoyForums

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3 ]

Subject: Re: Mobile phone mast Hempstead Ave

Author: Dave

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 08:52:43 02/19/07 Mon In reply to: Martin 's message, "Re: Mobile phone mast Hempstead Ave" on 12:14:36 02/18/07 Sun i've looked at some of the websites giving the dangerous aspects of these masts and it seems to me utter lunacy to be putting a mast within yards of residential property.due to the slope of the ground either side of the Vale it means that many bungalows will be on the same level as the top section of the transmitter! surely if the mast has to be built at all, presumably to cover the "dead" reception area along the Vale, it could be sited at the end of the vale near the tv mast.this mast covers a similar area for television signals and is a bit further away from housing. >>Yesterday (Saturday) I delivered 70 copies of the >>notice to other houses including all of Arlington >>Gardens, most of Hempstead Road all of Heathfield Ave, >>Saltdean Vale from the bus shelter to the newsagent >>and back along the other side. About 10 houses each >>side of Lustrells Crescent and Saltdean Vale halfway >>along to Mount Drive. >>I was hoping to cover Greenbank, more of Lustrells >>Crescent and all of Saltdean ideally. If anyone is >>able to cover these areas and more, it will increase >>awareness. >>Hopefully this will generate a maximum number of >>objections. > >How fantastic ive been talking to alot of people and >know someone who lives at the council who will also >object dirctly for us. I think we will get the 5 >objections we needed to make them think further about >the mask. well done Mr Ward for your efforts. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Mobile phone mast Hempstead Ave

Author: ruby [Edit]

Date Posted: 09:14:51 02/19/07 Mon more power to the protest group! if you need any further ideas and grounds for objecting to this phone mast look at the argus website.www.theargus.co.uk go to archive and request "phone mast" you will be amazed! >i've looked at some of the websites giving the >dangerous aspects of these masts and it seems to me >utter lunacy to be putting a mast within yards of >residential property.due to the slope of the ground >either side of the Vale it means that many bungalows >will be on the same level as the top section of the >transmitter! surely if the mast has to be built at >all, presumably to cover the "dead" reception area >along the Vale, it could be sited at the end of the >vale near the tv mast.this mast covers a similar area >for television signals and is a bit further away from >housing. > > > > > > > > > >>>Yesterday (Saturday) I delivered 70 copies of the >>>notice to other houses including all of Arlington >>>Gardens, most of Hempstead Road all of Heathfield >Ave, >>>Saltdean Vale from the bus shelter to the newsagent >>>and back along the other side. About 10 houses each >>>side of Lustrells Crescent and Saltdean Vale halfway >>>along to Mount Drive. >>>I was hoping to cover Greenbank, more of Lustrells >>>Crescent and all of Saltdean ideally. If anyone is >>>able to cover these areas and more, it will increase >>>awareness. >>>Hopefully this will generate a maximum number of >>>objections. >> >>How fantastic ive been talking to alot of people and >>know someone who lives at the council who will also >>object dirctly for us. I think we will get the 5 >>objections we needed to make them think further about >>the mask. well done Mr Ward for your efforts.