[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 23:22:33 11/10/16 Thu
To be fair, financial aid was only standardized across different Ivies back in the old days before the consent decree.
Post-decree, each Ivy can evaluate and award financial aid in any manner that it wants. We read from time to time about students who appeal their initial awards successfully, getting a bigger check from their school.
Furthermore and specific to Harvard, the basketball coach makes more than a million dollars a year. Construction will soon start on an arena costing tens of millions. Now the Wall Street Journal is reporting that which is obvious to any Ivy fan, that Harvard is 100% committed to becoming a basketball "powerhouse," the ostensible restrictions of the AI be damned.
Given the financial commitment of tens of millions of dollars made to coach and stadium as well as the academic sacrifices made in recruiting, what do you think the odds are that a physics major whose family makes $X per year receives the exact same financial aid as a basketball recruit whose family makes the same $X per year?
Low, if not zero. That qualifies as a discretionary kind of athletic scholarship.
And of course, if your family makes less than $100,000 or so, you're on a free ride. Whether you call it financial aid or an athletic scholarship, that's straight cash, homie.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]