[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 11:22:53 01/18/17 Wed
The problem (this one, anyway) I have with GG isn't that the 24/7 ratings system is perfect, I know it and others are not, it's his insistence on re-calibrating everything (game outcomes, recruiting, history, etc.) according to his personal preferences that have no objective basis. If he had seen the player in question, or knows how his rating was obtained, that might be different (although I think that he would probably still rate Dartmouth recruits higher, just ... because).
And I happen to like the "earuits are noed. silyter cerns" method, myself. I doubt Holtsie would dispute its fundamental logic.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]