VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]
Subject: Re: If Harvard beats Yale


Author:
Travis
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 19:23:15 11/15/21 Mon
In reply to: Ed S. 's message, "Re: If Harvard beats Yale" on 19:04:10 11/15/21 Mon

I have a suspicion that the initial statement out of the Ivy League office the Sunday after the P-H game was issued at Harvard's behest.

Bad calls are made every day in every Ivy League game in every Ivy League sport. Some of those bad calls affect the outcome of the game. Some of them also happen at the very end of the game. Some of them affect championships.

And yet, out of all the thousands if not millions of bad calls made in all the Ivy games over the decades, the Ivy League office issues a statement on a weekend morning about this one incident? As far as I can remember, this is absolutely unprecedented.

That's Harvard sway, baby. But they've shot their wad now.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: If Harvard beats Yale


Author:
Two Cents
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:54:20 11/15/21 Mon

The league office issued the statement because the call was unprecedented. I have not heard anyone say they can ever recall an official using replay to give a coach a timeout. Whistle on the field never blew and it sure looked like they only went to replay booth after Surace went nuts on the sideline and gestured up to the replay booth. Would love it if one person could cite a situation where a replay booth decision awarded a team a timeout. Was watching the Packers game yesterday and LaFleur tried to call a timeout right by a ref before ball was snapped and official did not give it to him. And nobody is saying Surace or Princeton did anything wrong during that situation. It was just an inexcusable call in this day and age.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:


Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.