VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]
Subject: Re: CU basketball


Author:
cadyellow
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 17:54:47 11/30/21 Tue
In reply to: The Mountain Lion 's message, "Re: CU basketball" on 09:11:11 11/30/21 Tue

Pilling and CU president should bite the bullet now and replace Engels. I understood that it will be costly if he is under contract, but I think in the end it will be more costly to do all the million things required to resurrect a program that has fallen off a cliff and will take years to crawl back with a decent reputation. It's like selling a stock in a crash and making some money back as opposed to losing it all. I feel bad for the good players that are flailing in the wind trying to play well, but are left to their own devices as if they were playing in an elaborate pick up game. There seems to be no formal--or at least effective-- game plan other than a few back door "Ivy-league looking" plays which sometimes work, but often fail. I understand that CU was not in a position to pay up for Smith, but Engels was too quick a choice as replacement. With CU just completing a winning NCAA post season championship in 2016, albeit CIT, I would imagine they would have had many high caliber coaches wanting the job, with the usual trappings of high profile NYC media attention, MSG appearances, etc. It is not too late for a change, but CU administration often moves glacially, like trying to turn a large cruise liner around. Look how many years of CU football utter collapse before the university took action. Better late than never in that case, but the damage took a toll, as will be the case with BB before too long. Believe it or not, before Amaker, Columbia had a winning all time record over Harvard going back over the decades. The difference is that CU admin needs an earthquake to make changes. When HYP teams have a couple of bad years they get to work and right the ship and wash away the mess before it lingers and does serious damage. CU seems to be in a rebuilding phase every year now in BB. My understanding is that "rebuilding" a program should take 1 or 2 (sometimes 3) years, but not 7-10, as it looks now...Women's BB on the other has has changed for the better on a dime under Griffith. At this point, CU mens teams is not capable of doing more than managing to try to keep their losses to under ten points. If, at some point they take a lead, they are not capable of keeping it. (These assessments are not based on the first 5 games but the last 70). This year they could well end up ten spaces away from the bottom of Kenpom rankings... Apologies for the long rant but I hear the voices of many unhappy and frustrated posters.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> Subject: Re: CU basketball


Author:
OLD LION (ALL TRUE)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:25:27 11/30/21 Tue

Engles seems like a decent man but this is not a good fit. The only way to effectuate change is to inundate Pilling, Bollinger and Bollinger’s EVP Gerry Rosberg with a cri de couer that it is really, really bad for Columbia to have a non-competitive team on the floor night after night. The final blow was watching Bolster get stripped in the back court by a Lafayette guard.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: CU basketball


Author:
cadyellow
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:30:57 11/30/21 Tue

Yes, I have nothing against Engles as a person. He is working very hard, but he seems to be simply a poor coach. Why should CU team be the one to suffer. He is being paid well presumably, while the players and school get hurt...One caveat, however....Of course relieving him of his duties at this juncture is a catch-22. It is simply not possible with a non-professional program unless he broke the law or something. But maybe at least have him replaced immediately after this season is over?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: CU basketball


Author:
observer
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:37:49 11/30/21 Tue

As they say, money talks, bullshit walks. Any alum who wants to buy out a coach contract better come equipped with the lucre to back it up.

Ask LSU.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: CU basketball


Author:
cadyellow
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:30:49 12/01/21 Wed

Wondering what will happen if Engles leads the team to a 2-34 record this year (which, regrettably, is quite possible), whether that will make a difference to the administration? Hard to know. I used to go to 3 or 4 games a year, but have stopped going. I wish the best for the players and sincerely hope my dire forecasts are overly exaggerated.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: No it isn't


Author:
Go Green
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:43:45 12/01/21 Wed


I can guarantee you that Columbia is not going 2-34 this season.

:)

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: CU basketball


Author:
Roar Lion
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:56:49 12/01/21 Wed

They are very young and should improve over the course of the season. The two best players are playing their first college games and showing talent, albeit inconsistently. We played okay vs. BC, for example. But Penn beat Lafayette by 28 and Lafayette destroyed us. Pilling could explain away a terrible W-L if we're competitive and improving, but if we lose a bunch of Ivy games by 30 it will be hard to look the other way.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:


Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.