VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]
Subject: Re: Kyle Juszczyk


Author:
Ivy Inquisitor
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 13:59:13 01/21/22 Fri
In reply to: Ghost of 1961 's message, "Re: Kyle Juszczyk" on 10:01:42 01/21/22 Fri

As mentioned in this thread for years the Fullback position has been phasing out. This will continue except for triple option teams. For some strange motive to starting in the 90's Fullback spot was limited to a lead blocker. Ghost of 1961: If you remember coming out of Harvard Juszczyk was a receiving tight end. SF utilizes him a receiving threat. That's probably the reason they went with him. I'd would have assumed a back up QB made more sense. Yet this shows his versatility. That's interesting ST Steve Tasker was a holder. Tasker was a tenuous hitter I don't know why Buffalo didn't switch him to safety

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Maybe they didn't switch him to safety...


Author:
Go Green
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:03:35 01/21/22 Fri


.... because he was a tenuous hitter?

:)

And I recently watched "Four Falls of Buffalo" on EPSN+ (even though it came out a while ago). Highly recommended!!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Maybe they didn't switch him to safety...


Author:
Ivy Inquisitor
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:24:04 01/21/22 Fri

I forgot to add "he was never a"tenuous hitter. Tasker was fierce on kickoff coverage I always thought he would have made a good safety. I'll check out the Four Falls of Buffalo. They should have beaten NGY in SB 25. Buffalo was more competitive than I though they would be in SB 26 against Washington.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:


Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.