* Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>by ancatdoh (Thu Dec 21 2006 07:50:17) Ignore this >User | Report Abuse > > >------------------------------------------------------- >------------------------- > >Reading your posts, I'm wondering how far you got in >school. Not very, judging by the numerous errors in >spelling and grammar and poor sentence structure. If >you're going to call somebody "dilusional," you at >least ought to know how to spell the word. You never >answered my question: How many books (with no >pictures) about ME history and geopolitics translated >from Arabic and Farsi by the US state department have >you read? Radical muslim THEORY??? Where were you in >1979 during the Iranian revolution? Does NOTHING OBL >say EVER penetrate your Bush hatred obsessed brain? > >Your position that "9/11 was an inside job" ignores >every single event in the last 35 years of Middle >Eastern history. > >You've posted opinion polls and individual opinions >that fit your absurd conspiracy theory. I've posted >FACTS. Actual history you can look up if you ever had >the slightest intellectual curiousity, from verifiable >news agencies. Go to the BBC, Reuters if you think >American agencies can't be trusted, and google the >phrase "Osama bin Laden quotes." No need to take my >word for it, genius. > >No WMD in Iraq? Better let these people know, and note >how many of them said it while Bush was Governor of >Texas: Or were they all in on it TOO? > >"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq >the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction >and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom >line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 > >"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our >purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the >threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction >program." - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 > >"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens >there matters a great deal here. For the risks that >the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, >chemical or biological weapons against us or our >allies is the greatest security threat we face." - >Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998 > >"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, >as he has ten times since 1983." - Sandy Berger, >Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 > >"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and >consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to >take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air >and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond >effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to >end its weapons of mass destruction programs." - >Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl >Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry( D - MA), >and others Oct. 9, 1998 > >"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of >weapons of mass destruction technology which is a >threat to countries in the region and he has made a >mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. >Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 > >"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building >weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his >cronies." >- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. >10, 1999 > >"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has >invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate >that biological, chemical and nuclear programs >continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. >In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery >systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit >missile program to develop longer-range missiles that >will threaten the United States and our allies." >- Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham >(D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001 > >"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein >is a tyrant and threat to the peace and stability of >the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United >Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction >and the means of delivering them." - Sen. Carl Levin >(D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002 > >"We know that he has stored secret supplies of >biological and chemical weapons throughout his >country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 > >"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has >proven impossible to deter and we should assume that >it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - >Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 > >"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is >seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." >- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 > >"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October >of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains >some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, >and that he has since embarked on a crash course to >build up his chemical and biological warfare >capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is >seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, >WV), Oct. 3, 2002 > >"I will be voting to give the President of the United >States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to >disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly >arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is >a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John >F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 > >"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is >working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and >will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five >years .... We also should remember we have always >underestimated the progress Saddam has made in >development of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. >Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002 > >"He has systematically violated, over the course of >the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution >that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his >chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear >capacity. This he has refused to do" - Rep. Henry >Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002 > >"In the four years since the inspectors left, >intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has >worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons >stock, his missile delivery capability, and his >nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and >sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.. >It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam >Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage >biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying >to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton >(D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 > >"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling >evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a >number of years, a developing capacity for the >production and storage of weapons of mass >destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 > >"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. >He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an >oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly >grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to >miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating >America's response to his continued deceit and his >consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. ... >So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass >destruction is real." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), >Jan. 23. 2003 > >Keep hating if it makes you feel important. Just don't >expect anyone with a brain to take you seriously. > >Thank you, drive through please. > > >by ancatdoh (Thu Dec 21 2006 14:00:12) Ignore this >User | Report Abuse > > >------------------------------------------------------- >------------------------- > >Your reading comprehension skills are as poor as your >reasoning. > >Point out in ANY of my posts where I said or even >SUGGESTED "all arabs are terrorists." Keep PRETENDING >that's what I've said and wringing your hands. > >You keep wanting to pretend that I've been >cheerleading Bush, and I never have. What I HAVE done >is shoot your ridiculous, inane and childish argument >that "9/11 was an inside job" FULL OF HOLES. > >You link to CNN opinion polls. How does that prove >your silly conspiracy theory? One third of the country >thinks it's possible "9/11 was an inside job," which >proves two thirds of the country is smarter than that. > >You simply hate Bush. BFD. So you hate him. Whatever. > >Did you actually READ any of the articles you've >spammed? Do you actaully follow the LOGIC in your >whack job conspiracy theories? > >Why would our enemies want to help us destroy the WTC >and Pentagon and then bring down the full weight of >the US military on them? What would Bush stand to GAIN >from that? How does launching a war against Iraq help >Bush or the republican party? Made him and the >republican party real popular, didn't it? I'm sure he >WANTED to be in the position he's in now. > >Yeah, genius, I'm fully aware that we NOW know there >were no WMD. But you're blissfully and willfully >ignorant the whole world THOUGHT he had them. Clinton >and his entire administration did. That's why he >launched Operation Desert Fox. Foreign intelligence >agencies did. Tony Blair did. Only AFTER Saddam was >defeated did we know the facts. Were all those senior >Democrats LYING when they said what they said? And >later VOTED to go to war with Iraq? You never answered >the question: Were they in on it TOO? > >Clinton CONTINUED THE SAME POLICIES you condemn Reagan >and Bush for. Oooh, Rumsfeld shook hands with >Saddam!!! So did Kofi Annan, who also PROFITED from >the oil for food deal that happened while Clinton was >president. Where's your teen angst fueled hate for >Clinton and the UN? > >"Helping Saddam" NOT TO LOSE THE IRAN/IRAQ war is not >the same as helping him WIN. Would you have supported >military action during Reagan's two terms? Of course >you wouldn't have--you'd have been shreiking about New >World Order. > >It's amazingly funny that you would tell me to >"research 9/11." > >How long have YOU been reading up on ME history and >geopolitics? I mean books that don't have pictures, >not conspiracy websites of poseurs like Conner. Ever >study history, mass communications or journalism in >college? Ever BEEN to college? Did you even finish >HIGH SCHOOL? > >If you have, it's certainly not apparent from your >posts and relfects very poorly on your teachers.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.