[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8]910 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:06:01 01/03/04 Sat
Author: Repost
Subject: Spam

In article <48SdnRVPEMsUaGuiRVn-sA@bright.net>, usenetharvested@2mbit.com
> Fruns Dimerik wrote:
> > Is the Spam Can Act having its effect? I do notice a difference since
> > Jan 1: my Yahoo mailbox has dried up, only Nigerian scammers are
> > getting through, although less so than before. Another US based
> > mailbox doesn't get spam either. But I do get spam on an
> > international mail account, based outside the US.
> >
> The live stats at www.postini.com have *increased* 2% since Jan 1.
> This is a much more accurate measure, as Postini is a mix of a vast mix of
> different types of email accounts, from ISPs to corporate LANs to schools,
> etc.

Here's a different viewpoint: my mailserver uses numerous block lists,
but does no content filtering. As a result, the ones that get through are
nearly always coming from previously-unlisted ip's (presumably trojan-
infected proxies).

Since Jan 1 the total spamload hasn't especially dropped, but the mix has
changed substantially - at this point nearly the only ones getting
through are pillspams (mostly viagra-and-such with some general pharmacy
as well). I haven't seen a mortgage/debt spam and even the Paris Hilton
stuff has dropped out.

Two possible theories (with no evidence for either):

1. Do Pill spams offer a higher pay, so are worth the increased risk and
trouble, and thus attract more spammers?

2. Pill spammers had already moved offshore (read: China) in larger
numbers than the others, so have suffered less interruption by suddenly-
nervous domestic ISP's?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

Type your message here:

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.