Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>No, Tribbie-Tyke. I made the point you'd rather I not >have made: that neither paper has a corner on the >correction market. What forced you to take umbrage was >the fact I mentioned the Trib tends to deny and bury >their corrections better than the PG does. PG is >arrogant one way [John R and Beltway] and as for the >Trib, we already know how their arrogance works. > >Hey, answer this question, would ya? Does the Trib >offer rewards to the kiddies who post anti-PG digs >here? And if so, what kind? > >>Great comments FD! Rather than address the issue, you >>give the classic nondenial denial answer: Hey the Trib >>makes mistakes, too. >> >>Classic PG arrogance! >> >>>Boy, that's something! >>> >>>And by golly, I betcha up the river on Martindale >>>Street, the staff NEVER MAKES MISTAKES! No. Never. >Or >>>they ignore them unless the complainer is a local >>>rightie or otherwise has clout with the Trib >>>"mis-management." Then they might get a correction. >>>Perhaps. >>> >>>>Monday's P-G had nine items under Corrections. Is >>that >>>>a record?

Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.