Protect Habitat with a Click!
Non-profit ad served by VoyForums...

VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 06:11:32 11/06/16 Sun
Author: One Down
Subject: Re: New, "improved" Greensburg Trib?
In reply to: Coffee desk 's message, "Re: New, "improved" Greensburg Trib?" on 20:34:23 11/05/16 Sat

It's true Westmoreland has been moving GOP but the Dems still have an edge. That said, the Trib likes to believe they and their deceased Dear Leader, Scaife, made that change happen. They didn't.


As for reporter Zwick, he no doubt is trying to hold to the right wing bias that continues to be apparent in the Scaife-less Trib, led by Clueless Bertetto. He probably figures if he slants his stories to the right he'll get brownie points and maybe some day become as famous a biased reporter as recently-departed Salena Zito.

Even in the depressed market for reporters, if Zwick was any good, he wouldn't be working here. So far as his awful writing, by Trib standards, that's considered quite good. The editors don't care. They never did.

Of course despite the bias, the Trib also didn't endorse Trump.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


[> [> [> [> Re: New, "improved" Greensburg Trib? -- Two 2 Go, 11:54:49 01/25/17 Wed [1]

The Trib leans right? They employee reporters that lean right? Seems like a Republican paper. Zwick cant be any good because he works there. You read the story. "Clueless Bertetto" must be doing something right. Again, you read the story and felt the need to comment. That is the point of a free press. To get the people to discuss the issues facing them. I doubt you have ever initiated that reaction with your work.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: New, "improved" Greensburg Trib? -- One Down, 04:33:38 01/26/17 Thu [1]

Biased journalism was unacceptable in Scaife's time and it's still unacceptable. Keep the opinion on the Opinion page. As for the rest of your comments, pride in mediocrity doesn't elevate it from being mundane and subpar. If this is the basis Jenny's defenders are using to state her case, it's no basis at all. It's nothing. But over the years, we've come to expect nothing from Trib Total Media. No reason to assume that will ever change.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Re: New, "improved" Greensburg Trib? -- Two 2 Go, 09:11:27 01/26/17 Thu [1]

All journalism is biased. Even if you think your are reading an unbiased article it is still subjected to the authors POV. I accept that when I read the Trib, it leans right. The same as watching FoxNews. I also expect the PG and CNN to lean left. That is why I watch/read both. To see the difference in opinion and figure the truth is somewhere in the middle. I am thankful to have two papers in a smaller market. I also happen to think that management at both publications is doing everything possible so they can to survive. I think this is a good thing. It keeps people employed and gives the consumer multiple channels. Does quality suffer when cutting cost? Yes. The alternative is for both papers to fold. Put 1,500 - 2,000 out of work. Listen to everyone complain about how there is no source of local news. I prefer a reduction over a closure.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: New, "improved" Greensburg Trib? -- Poxon Both, 22:36:35 01/26/17 Thu [1]

I have a surprise for you: both of them could close in spite of your reflexive cheerleading. The PG doesn't lean THAT far left. The fact both Block twins are Trump-friendly is no secret, though the PG endorsed no presidential candidate.


The PG has no decent conservative columnists. Ruth Ann Dailey is little more than a dull, faith-based rightie with no real insight. Trib editorial editor Bob Pellegrino is a by-the-numbers conservative nearly as dull as Ruth Ann.

The Trib in Greensburg and Tarentum is still a paper, even though it's shrunken to virtually nothing. Pittsburgh is a website, and not a very good one. At the top, Jennifer Bertetto is a bureaucrat with no real knowledge of journalism. If she has standards, her recent promotions sure don't reflect them. At TTM, mediocrity rules. No props to the PG, on a steady downhill decline for years with many of their best staffers leaving and the editors indifferent to readers and anything that doesn't involve saving their own jobs. Does anybody think David Shribman cares about this region, or anything except his dull Sunday column?

Both PG and Trib have gotten leaner and meaner to the point they aren't worth subscribing to or buying over the counter. Feel free to cheer the continued existence of two lousy papers, but I won't be joining in the hurrahs.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Hard-hitting Greensburg reporting -- Don Makewaves, 12:42:17 01/30/17 Mon [1]


[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2016 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.