VoyForums

VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:01:00 07/18/07 Wed
Author: Randy
Author Host/IP: cpe-66-25-204-230.sw.res.rr.com / 66.25.204.230
Subject: Re: Texas is not part of teh south!!!
In reply to: Randy (TexasReb) 's message, "Re: Texas is not part of teh south!!!" on 17:52:36 07/18/07 Wed

>>Randy, I cannot reply much longer, because I must get
>>back to work.
>
>Thanks again for your reply, Travis. Here are mine...
>
>>1. Ranching has been in Texas since the Spaniards.
>>This goes back as far as the 17th century. The cowboy
>>of Texas came from south America.
>
>RANCHING, by your definition, goes back even further
>than THAT! You dont define it. Do you mean by
>"ranching" an economy dominated by large acreage of
>cattle? You must first define "ranching".
>
>No, the Texas cowboy does NOT have its prototype in
>the 17th century. Oh yeah, perhaps, you could make
>that connection in the same way that a blunderbuss
>musket was a forerunner to a Springfield rifle.
>EVERYthing has a connection and evolution to
>SOMETHING. Mississippi and Alabama are "cattle
>states" too. They were also, at one time, possessions
>of Spain.
>
>Bottom line. The original "Texas Cowboys" were mostly
>ex-Confederate soldiers and/or sons of them. Their
>habits and all were mostly derived from the original
>Anglo Southern stock, NOT the Mexican "Vaquero" THAT
>only makes sense, as most of them CAME west from East
>Texas and the Old South. Do you truly think they
>changed culture when they crossed the Sabine River?
>That is, with all due respect, ridiculous.
>
>
>>2. Playing the race card? I don't know what you mean
>>about that, but if you don't see things from other
>>peoples perspectives you don't get a complete history.
>
>All I can say here is, go back and read your own posts
>on THAT one. Look at the origin of times that
>race/ethnic backgroud is mentioned...
>
>>3. Food? Yes, I do see what people around me are
>>eating and it's not fried okra. I live in Central
>>Texas now, not south Texas.
>
>As I say, Travis, YOUR Texas is not MY Texas.
>
>>4. Hispanic heritage? I have some of that, but I am
>>mostly European by blood.(French, Irish, scot, with
>>some hispanic and native American).
>
>I respect that.
>
>>5. My experience is not Texan? Well, by that
>>definition, most Texans' experience is not Texan.
>
>No. It is that your experience is not truly Texas.
>As to your definition of "most Texans"? I am really
>AM getting weary of arguing this point. Let me state
>it for the record:
>
>86% of Texans considerer themselves to live in the
>South. 70% consider themselves Southerners. When
>given a choice, 71% of Texans chose "South" over
>"West". As a point of numerical reference? This
>figure beat out North Carolina and Virginia, and etc,
>etc. (although in those states, the alternate choice
>was "East")
>
>With all due respect, it is you who seems to have an
>issue with this.
>
>Also, please check out settlement patterns in Texas.
>PLEASE. Migrants from the Deep South tended to settle
>in East Texas, and those from the Upper South went to
>North and Central Texas. West Texas was a bit of a
>combination...
>
>>
>>Also, I think that your arguments come from your own
>>perspective. YOur online name "Texasreb" shows your
>>southern pride.
>
>SURE it does! And I appreciate what you say!
>
>>I'm glad you are proud of your southern roots, but for
>>the majority of TExans outside of East TExas this is
>>not the case.
>
>See the figures on the Southern Focus Poll I posted
>(this is a culmination of 14 years of survey) What
>else CAN be said but how MOST Texans feel on being
>Southern or not?
>
>
>>6. Sorry, but TExas did fair better than the majority
>>of other confederate states because of ranching.
>>Ranching did not come later as you say. Ranching has
>>been practiced long before with the Canary Islands
>>practicing it first.
>
>*sighs* At LEAST you now admit Texas was a
>Confederate State! LOL Great. Earlier you didn't
>see, to acknowlege it at all!
>
>BUT.. as long as we are on the subject?
>
>Ranching came into being in Texas AFTER the War. Read
>the history of it!
>
>>
>>7. I would request that we keep this civil.
>
>
>I very much agree. And I put it up for judgement of
>others to decide if this has not been the case so
>far...

Best Texas and Southern regards!

Randy (TexasReb)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (required):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.