Friday, May 2, 2008 - New servers are in! Click-in for more info!
VoyForums

Support VoyForums by visiting our sponsor, www.PainEase.com.

VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Monday January 29 2007
Author: U ARE STUPID (ANGER)
Author Host/IP: NoHost / 71.80.32.10
Subject: Re: swimming in general
In reply to: know it all 's message, "swimming in general" on Tuesday January 23 2007

I think you are ignorant and stupid and knows nothing about swimming. You need to stop calling persons "poor" and talking about things you dont know about. Just go find a place and sit for a moment and think about what you said. Your intentions seem to be good but everything else reflects pure dumb ignorance ie. GRAMMAR, TONE, SPELLING, EVERYTHING...perhaps you should consider a class in one of your high society private schools to improve your communication skills. Put a bag over your head freak.



>it has been a long time since i have made a post on
>this site. my time in swimming has been long
>
>i have read some of the post that were put up by the
>swimmers and i am in agreement with what most of them
>have said.
>the cuts for pan ams. it is unfortunate that they were
>changed but it worked out better for the females. i
>think that those not knowing need to look at the last
>3 pan am results and understand that some of those
>girls have an opprutunity to get a second swim with
>their now personal best times. the asua times were
>based on results of previous meets and i think people
>need to understand that at these meets only 2 can come
>from each country. it is an opprutinity for swimmers
>to experince a high level of competition without all
>the pressure.
>the disparity between the best men and the others and
>the best women and the others is much less. that is
>why the times are faster for them.
>mistakes may have been made with the cuts for the
>higher level meets but there have never been this much
>swimmers in different events acheiving such high
>levels of performance in the sport. so there has to be
>adjustments by the decision makers to ensure that all
>have the best opprotunity without embarrassing the
>fedreation.
>look at what the pan ams did for alana dillette; she
>has continued to improve because she now understands
>what has to be done to be the best.
>apart from jeremy, right now, their is not a lot in
>the pipeline with regards to the men. there are a few
>holding down the fort and the others need time to
>mature. some of them are swimming fast but are they
>swimming as fast as some of the boys back in the day?
>they have some huge shoes to fill. you had to swim
>24.6 back in the day to make a 50fr final at
>nationals. allan murry can come back and win 5ofr at
>nationals 2006. yes, the boys have plenty work to do,
>and they need to work.
>parents, you need to stop babying the boys, as some of
>our top senior boys are being beaten by senior girls
>in their best events. that is a no no. lets get it
>together.
>
>oh! nationals in may, an absolute step backward for
>swimming. we have over 300 swimmers in the federation
>and we are basing our main meet on about 10 seniors
>who have to go to pan ams.
>from the last time i remember, people usually come to
>see the younger swimmers as their races have been much
>more exciting.
>or, have we catered to a minority of ex-pat children,
>that usullay go home before the best date, which is
>the independence holiday wekend. their schools close
>early and do not have to do government exams because
>they are not subsidized. again, just a few.
>what about the effect it is going to have on the
>swimmers that went to carifta about a month earlier?
>oh boy! some of us know so little about swimming, a
>taper and the effects of a taper on perfamce shortly
>after. ask the swimmers that went to cisc, did
>nationals, and cac. swam like crap at cac because it
>was too far from their initial taper for cisc. we are
>looking at possibly 36 swimmers with this same time
>frame possibly not swimming wellat the "may" nationals.
>i can't forget the poor folks in freeport who probbaly
>will not come, or will be very small. they have their
>reasons as they have been living in that environment
>and understand their parameters. rumor has it, some of
>their top swimmers will not make the trip, exams are
>important!
>boy would i like to put my name, but swimmers, i got
>ya back! gents, keep swimming hard by training hard.
>haters are only motivation, do not let anyone give you
>anything in swimming. TAKE WHAT YOU WANT BECAUSE THEY
>CAN'T TAKE IT FORM YOU!
>comeback! hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

  • Re: swimming in general -- You can do it........May Nationals here we come, Saturday February 03 2007
    VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
    Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
    * Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
    * HTML allowed in marked fields.
    Message subject (required):

    Name (required):

      Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

      E-mail address (optional):

    * Type your message here:

    Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

    Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

    [ Contact Forum Admin ]


    Forum timezone: GMT-5
    VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.