Create a New Forum Owner Login Contribute & Create Your Member account VoyUser Login (see contribute) VoyForums Directory/Categories No-ads: Completely remove ads from your forum VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News Help Desk VoyForums Exchange FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions Search VoyForums
Oklahoma Disaster Relief American Red Cross Together, we can save a life See Kare11.com's page for more ways to contribute. VoyForums Notice -- Quick Contributions: Donate $10 to the Red Cross: Text the word REDCROSS to 90999 Donate $10 to the Salvation Army: Text the word STORM to 80888 * The charge will appear on your cellphone bill.

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

Subject: Re: Invented discussion Author: James Daniel Stewart O'Neill, Esq, of that sort of Ilk [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: Mon, May 22 2006, 23:29:49 GMT In reply to: ROSS 's message, "Re: Invented discussion" on Tue, May 09 2006, 22:22:23 GMT << There are many layers to the writing to be decoded. Oh, I so certaionly agree. However, I will not allow Aisling's vagaries to interfere with my understanding of the text. Aisling, if you remember, was asleep the entire time. And just because she said a young black-haired poet came up and interfered with her, it does not follow that he did. I, too, have tasted of absinthe (a donation in my case from the holy pope). In my single-minded pursuit of truth, in regard to these books, nothing would I not do, or attempt or assign. You, sir, should you continue with these wayward interpretations, will do us all a kindly favour by including chapter and verse in future. I remain, yours, etc. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Invented discussion Author: RF [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Sat, May 27 2006, 22:01:45 GMT I’ll concede that Aisling favours erratic notions. My understanding of the text however is that she has a genuine passion, albeit with misguided actions as it turns out (especially at Greystones) for justice. I quote from Book 2 Page 82, 2nd verse “You, like many of us, were left with a feeling of disillusionment. I have vanquished such insecurities. I only ask that we make a modern reunion ………………… Do not let pity or hatred manifest in your reasons“ (You did ask for chapter and verse !) My problem however is that Aisling doesn’t take Vera serious enough (Yes I know you will say that proves your point) Does this mean “visions” and the “truth” are not compatible. [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: The Book Author: Ross [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Wed, Jun 07 2006, 21:58:36 GMT Dear JDS O'N esq I've further investigated. I'm afraid i've become a little obsessed with trying to decode the messages given by Dr Richings "For truth & victory we must pay" (Volume 2 after oriflamme) when talking to proff O'Farrell. Is Dr Richings calling for support for vera & buach? Richings is clever in his double talk.(bit orwellian dont you think) Dr Richings talks about a vision of a world where your soul is free as a confusing and elusive concept. Im off to investigate further. Kind regards Ross [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: The Book Author: Ross [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: Mon, Nov 27 2006, 20:10:00 GMT Has anyone else read these books and want to comment. [ Post a Reply to This Message ]