Click here for an easy and free way to help protect endangered habitat at The Rainforest Site! Non-profit ad by Voyager
VoyForums
Oklahoma Disaster Relief










American Red Cross
Together, we can save a life


See Kare11.com's page for more ways to contribute.

VoyForums Notice -- Quick Contributions:
Donate $10 to the Red Cross: Text the word REDCROSS to 90999
Donate $10 to the Salvation Army: Text the word STORM to 80888
* The charge will appear on your cellphone bill.

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 03:57:40 02/12/05 Sat
Author: m - 26 Jan 2005
Subject: Re: Report declares weeping Madonna inexplicable
In reply to: H - 26 Jan 2005 's message, "Re: Report declares weeping Madonna inexplicable" on 03:55:09 02/12/05 Sat


Male human blood on a statue does not explain much? First of all it explains that the blood is from a human male, which sort of explains quite a lot in regards to an inexplicable phenomenon that is obviously a hoax. Occums Razor applies here.

The world is big, but that doesn't mean you should believe anything or everything that you read or see, because it is out of the ordinary. The blood is not divine blood from a statue of an Isht Deva but from a male human being.
I can't believe you say it does not explain much in itself. It also has nothing to do with frogs and fish. It is an isolated incident.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2012 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.