Ape Men? 4 -- My Domain

GIVE FREE FOOD
www.TheHungerSite.com
-> Click Here <-

SAVE THE RAINFORESTS
www.TheRainforestSite.com
-> Click Here <-

Non-profit ad served by VoyForums...

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

Subject: Ape Men? 4

Author:
Pahu
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 12:46:52 06/30/09 Tue

Ape-Men? 4

Many experts consider the skulls of Peking “man” to be the remains of apes that were systematically decapitated and exploited for food by true man (i). Its classification, Homo erectus, is considered by most experts to be a category that should never have been created (j).

The first confirmed limb bones of Homo habilis were discovered in 1986. They showed that this animal clearly had apelike proportions (k) and should never have been classified as manlike (Homo) (l).

i. Bowden, pp. 90–137.

Marcellin Boule and Henri V. Vallois, Fossil Men (New York: The Dryden Press, 1957), p. 145.

j. “[The reanalysis of Narmada Man] puts another nail in the coffin of Homo erectus as a viable taxon.” Kenneth A. R. Kennedy, as quoted in “Homo Erectus Never Existed?” Geotimes, October 1992, p. 11.

k. Donald C. Johanson et al., “New Partial Skeleton of Homo Habilis from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania,” Nature, Vol. 327, 21 May 1987, pp. 205–209.

l. “We present a revised definition, based on verifiable criteria, for Homo and conclude that two species, Homo habilis and Homo rudolfensis, do not belong in the genus [Homo].” Bernard Wood and Mark Collard, “The Human Genus,” Science, Vol. 284, 2 April 1999, p. 65.

http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSciences30.html#wp1418274

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
><center> >Ape-Men? 4 ></center> >Many experts consider the skulls of Peking “man” to be >the remains of apes that were systematically >decapitated and exploited for food by true man (i). >Its classification, Homo erectus, is >considered by most experts to be a category that >should never have been created (j). > >The first confirmed limb bones of Homo habilis >were discovered in 1986. They showed that this >animal clearly had apelike proportions (k) and should >never have been classified as manlike (Homo) >(l). > >i. Bowden, pp. 90–137. > >Marcellin Boule and Henri V. Vallois, Fossil >Men (New York: The Dryden Press, 1957), p. 145. > >j. “[The reanalysis of Narmada >Man] puts another nail in the coffin of Homo erectus >as a viable taxon.” Kenneth A. R. Kennedy, >as quoted in “Homo Erectus Never Existed?” >Geotimes, October 1992, p. 11. > >k. Donald C. Johanson et al., “New Partial Skeleton of >Homo Habilis from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania,” Nature, >Vol. 327, 21 May 1987, pp. 205–209. > >l. “We present a revised >definition, based on verifiable criteria, for Homo and >conclude that two species, Homo habilis and Homo >rudolfensis, do not belong in the genus [Homo].” > Bernard Wood and Mark Collard, “The Human >Genus,” Science, Vol. 284, 2 April 1999, p. >65. > ><a rel=nofollow target=_blank >href="http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSci >ences30.html#wp1418274">http://www.creationscience.com/ >onlinebook/LifeSciences30.html#wp1418274</a>

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.