Missing Trunk 2 -- My Internet Home

Click here for an easy and free way to help feed the hungry at The Hunger Site! Non-profit ad by Voyager

Oklahoma Disaster Relief

American Red Cross
Together, we can save a life

See Kare11.com's page for more ways to contribute.

VoyForums Notice -- Quick Contributions:
Donate $10 to the Red Cross: Text the word REDCROSS to 90999
Donate $10 to the Salvation Army: Text the word STORM to 80888
* The charge will appear on your cellphone bill.

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:08:19 05/06/09 Wed
Author: Pahu
Subject: Missing Trunk 2

Missing Trunk 2

“Evolutionary biology’s deepest paradox concerns this strange discontinuity. Why haven’t new animal body plans continued to crawl out of the evolutionary cauldron during the past hundreds of millions of years? Why are the ancient body plans so stable?” Jeffrey S. Levinton, “The Big Bang of Animal Evolution,” Scientific American, Vol. 267, November 1992, p. 84.

“Granted an evolutionary origin of the main groups of animals, and not an act of special creation, the absence of any record whatsoever of a single member of any of the phyla in the Pre-Cambrian rocks remains as inexplicable on orthodox grounds as it was to Darwin.” T. Neville George (Professor of Geology at the University of Glasgow), “Fossils in Evolutionary Perspective,” Science Progress, Vol. 48, No. 189, January 1960, p. 5.

b. Strange Cambrian fossils, thought to exist only in the Burgess Shale of western Canada, have been discovered in southern China. See:

L. Ramsköld and Hou Xianguang, “New Early Cambrian Animal and Onychophoran Affinities of Enigmatic Metazoans,” Nature, Vol. 351, 16 May 1991, pp. 225–228.

Jun-yuan Chen et al., “Evidence for Monophyly and Arthropod Affinity of Cambrian Giant Predators,” Science, Vol. 264, 27 May 1994, pp. 1304–1308.

Evolving so many unusual animals during a geologic period is mind-boggling. But doing it twice in widely separated locations stretches credulity to the breaking point. According to the theory of plate tectonics, China and Canada were even farther apart during the Cambrian.

http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSciences28.html#wp1064364

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
><center> >Missing Trunk 2 ></center> > “Evolutionary biology’s deepest >paradox concerns this strange discontinuity. Why >haven’t new animal body plans continued to crawl out >of the evolutionary cauldron during the past hundreds >of millions of years? Why are the ancient body plans >so stable?” Jeffrey S. Levinton, “The Big >Bang of Animal Evolution,” Scientific American, > Vol. 267, November 1992, p. 84. > > “Granted an evolutionary origin >of the main groups of animals, and not an act of >special creation, the absence of any record whatsoever >of a single member of any of the phyla in the >Pre-Cambrian rocks remains as inexplicable on orthodox >grounds as it was to Darwin.” T. Neville >George (Professor of Geology at the University of >Glasgow), “Fossils in Evolutionary Perspective,” >Science Progress, Vol. 48, No. 189, January >1960, p. 5. > >b. Strange Cambrian fossils, thought to exist only in >the Burgess Shale of western Canada, have been >discovered in southern China. See: > >L. Ramsköld and Hou Xianguang, “New Early Cambrian >Animal and Onychophoran Affinities of Enigmatic >Metazoans,” Nature, Vol. 351, 16 May 1991, pp. >225–228. > >Jun-yuan Chen et al., “Evidence for Monophyly and >Arthropod Affinity of Cambrian Giant Predators,” >Science, Vol. 264, 27 May 1994, pp. 1304–1308. > >Evolving so many unusual animals during a geologic >period is mind-boggling. But doing it twice in widely >separated locations stretches credulity to the >breaking point. According to the theory of plate >tectonics, China and Canada were even farther apart >during the Cambrian. > ><a rel=nofollow target=_blank >href="http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSci >ences28.html#wp1064364">http://www.creationscience.com/ >onlinebook/LifeSciences28.html#wp1064364</a>

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.
The Voy.com User Agreement applies to all visitors.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2012 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.