VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01:41:44 08/26/05 Fri
Author: SomeNick
Subject: Re: Problem
In reply to: Anubis 's message, "Re: Problem" on 23:06:15 08/24/05 Wed


Actually, some of the people in Wikipedia complain that you might not be putting a lot of effort in Epsilon 96, specially when you said something like that you have not put a lot of effor in the project recently. You know, they visited your web site. They sort of said that if you dont care about Epsilon 96, then nobody will care about it. I suggest you let some time pass by, and when the RPG you told me you are making is pretty much working or something, try making a more professional article. These people at Wikipedia are hard to please...

-SomeNick










>I could, but the epsilon 96 universe is still under
>developement. I don't have really much to offer to the
>public, but I'll give them as much information as I
>can.
>Although that would probably mean bringing my entire
>site to wikipedia.
>
>Do I have to put the names of the people that are
>involved with my creation?
>
>
>>>I've made a small article at wikipedia dot org called
>>>Epsilon 96, check it out.
>>
>> I check it out. However, I noticed Wikipedia is
>>considering to delete it. They did that to Astroseries
>>once as well. I finally was able to write about
>>Astroseries as well, though I had to be far more
>>professional and even mention Stratagus around it
>>(since Stratagus is very notable, and Wikipedia takes
>>high notice on notable things). Apparently, they
>>don't think Epsilon 96 is notable enough to stay. I
>>would recommend you to find something notable to
>>relate it to, and then try again once your article
>>gets deleted. Just be more professional, show some
>>facts, and avoid mentioning yourself early on. That
>>might help your article stay.
>>
>>-SomeNick

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.