Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
He talks down to Republicans concerning the U.S. CONSTITUTION in lieu of the Scalia passing..
He bypasses the U.S. CONSTITUTION when it comes to his UNCONSTITUTIONAL executive "fiats" on ILLEGAL ALIEN AMNESTY and UNCONSTITUTIONAL gun control "mandates" and or executive "fiats"..
He craps on the same UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION when it encompasses CONSTITUTIONAL SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS issues..
He allows almost and upwards 10,000 Syrian "refugees" to enter this country. We have not the slightest bit of clue who these people really are.. The vetting system of a federal government to verify these same Syrian "refugees" is a total joke..
He bypasses the United States Congress in lieu of these same refugees as indicated..
He will not enforce in a very strict manner and circumstances, tight CONSTITUTIONAL ports of entry and absolute border control enactments and measures..
*So noted: A young Kate Steinle was tragically murdered by an ILLEGAL ALIEN who somehow made his way back into this country six different times through a porous, open, dangerous international port of entry.. The City of San Francisco with its UNCONSTITUTIONAL SANCTUARY POLICIES allowed this young woman to be murdered by the same ILLEGAL ALIEN... Remember??
He's sneered, snickered, badgered the other two branches of the federal government during the last seven years of his tenure..
He dressed down members on the SCOTUS during his first STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS because the same SCOTUS did not go along with him concerning a per peeve case he wanted in his favor.. (The 2009; STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS)
He's treated the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL as some sort of out dated rag as indicated..
And he has room to lecture, preach down to Republicans concerning the same UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION??