Author: George Archibald [Edit]
|
Date Posted: 09:53:33 09/19/05 Mon
A study has confirmed the premise of the Bush administration's
"Reading First" initiative that systematic phonics instruction is
essential in teaching young children of all backgrounds to read
successfully.
The study, just published by researchers of the National Institute
for Early Education Research and Rutgers University in New Jersey,
re-examined findings of the National Reading Panel (NRP) in 2000.
The study gives even greater weight than the NRP to the importance
of intensive phonics, which is systematic instruction of letter-sound
relations in English and how to use them to read texts with controlled
vocabulary.
"In our analyses, we found that programs using systematic phonics
instruction outperformed programs using less-systematic phonics," the
study concluded, adding that the difference with systematic phonics
"is statistically significant."
The study, titled "Teaching Children To Read: The Fragile Link
Between Science and Federal Education Policy," also confirmed the
NRP's finding that children's reading ability improves after they have
acquired basic "phonemic awareness and letter knowledge" by second
grade, when phonics instruction is combined with language activities
and tutoring.
"Systematic phonics instruction when combined with language
activities and individual tutoring may triple the effect of phonics
alone," concluded the study team led by Gregory Camilli of Rutgers'
graduate school of education in Brunswick, N.J.
The report said the NRP did not focus enough on language
activities and tutoring as part of a comprehensive literacy program in
elementary schools.
"As federal policies are formulated around early literacy
curricula and instruction, these findings indicate that phonics, as
one aspect of the complex reading process, should not be
over-emphasized," the report said.
Reid Lyon of the National Institute of Child Health and Human
Development, who is President Bush's chief reading adviser, called the
study "very strong."
"The Camilli study does reflect a more mature and scientific
approach to understanding particular findings, given that it was a
scientific attempt to replicate [the NRP study], which is one of the
most crucial things we can do in science," Mr. Lyon said.
The Camilli study re-analyzed 37 of 38 scientific reading studies
over several decades that were used for the NRP report, plus three
other studies, and applied a numerical "effect size" for use of
"systematic phonics" versus "less-systematic phonics" and "no phonics"
reading and language activities.
The Camilli study gave a .514 score to "systematic phonics,"
compared with a .41 effect size in the NRP report.
"The National Reading Panel found very clearly what Camilli also found, that phonics is absolutely necessary, it's non-negotiable, but by itself is not sufficient," Mr. Lyon said. "Phonics has to be provided in a comprehensive reading program that also includes phonemic awareness, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension."
|