Re: Ratings for Jack announved -- WCBS-FM.ORG Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wednesday, April 24, 10:54:20am [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Tuesday, February 28, 06:32:01am
Author: Jeff Scheckner
Subject: Re: Ratings for Jack announved
In reply to: Alan Berman 's message, "Ratings for Jack announved" on Tuesday, February 28, 12:51:42am

I reviewed the latest Arbitron ratings and things don't look good for Jack. The station was down in 25-54, morning drive, middays, PM Drive and even in evenings with adults. Jack-FM is faring worse in the suburbs: Nassau from 1.7 to 1.4 and Middlesex, Somerset, Union Counties NJ 1.6 to 1.3.

In the Fall Jack pointed to signs of growth in desired demographics despite the negligible increase in overall ratings. Now the trend seems to be down overall and from what I can see the rating is actually down further if one looks at the November to December to January trend.

A few months ago, Joel Hollander kept pointing to WNEW-FM stressing it takes a year or longer to build but now that station had a few down books and appears stuck at 1.8.

No more excuses--they should finally admit they made a terrible mistake on June 3.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Ratings for Jack announved -- Steve Green, Tuesday, February 28, 10:10:36am
- Re: Ratings for Jack announved -- Larry, Tuesday, February 28, 10:28:59am
  - Re: Ratings for Jack announved -- Alan Berman, Tuesday, February 28, 10:55:44am
    - Re: Ratings for Jack announved -- Sue P., Tuesday, February 28, 11:46:15am
      - Re: Ratings for Jack announved -- Alan Berman, Tuesday, February 28, 12:24:41pm
        Re: Ratings for Jack announved -- Richard Kaplan, Tuesday, February 28, 02:48:36pm
        Re: Ratings for Jack announved -- Frank De Rosa, Tuesday, February 28, 08:28:05pm
        Re: Ratings for Jack announved -- Sue P., Tuesday, February 28, 10:20:53pm
        Re: Ratings for Jack announved -- Michele, Wednesday, March 01, 03:09:10am
        Re: Ratings for Jack announved -- Sue P., Wednesday, March 01, 10:57:43pm
        Re: Ratings for Jack announved -- Kevin Delahanty, Saturday, March 04, 03:38:07pm
        Re: Ratings for Jack announved -- Bob Schappert, Monday, March 06, 01:38:24am

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.