Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

Type your message here:
> >Applaud to your blog. Was the reference there to “the >father” as for, the elect of God being deceived a >typo? I need a reference where Satan ever deceived the >Father? > >Over to some question whether and or where/when was >Jesus anointed? Again applaud for your research. Me I >would question even any earthly man anointing the >messiah presupposing that’s who he is/was. Many >consider when He was baptized by John the Baptist and >coming out of the waters all saw a dove ascending and >a voice from high above proclaiming “Him to be his >beloved son whom He is well pleased.” >Even John too there for my point said to Jesus – even >who was his first cousin – “I am not worthy to unlatch >your shoes” when Jesus announced that John should >baptize him. >So we have it seems an argument as to an actual or >(f)actual anointing of the first kind. > >The bible has been commented on by all kinds of >people. I suppose a efforted personal faith somewhere >from outset in our life do first next we synchronize >all the truth around it. Paul in the New Testament >talked about there being one God though we trivialize >the trinity. True that elohim who created man in >Genesis is plural and so whether is meant as two, >three or a hundred I agree a better explanation is >neede. >The good deal of comments Jodi made on the truth of >Jesus and of the Bible are my points one for >Christians coming out of their church’s these days for >support of the latter rain work of the spirit of God >anywhere but in church’s as again agreed there is only >mostly bunk being passed out and too any bible >translation or paraphrase will do for the leaders who >like tools, maybe we can suppose. The effect in any >worship setting is application of the “given word” by >the holy spirit on hearts. Unless that happens from >the exact and true text and context you have falsity >of any kind and sort so again without disagreement it >would seem the study of god or the Bible would go or >come under another forum altogether. I have said at >times if all one in the pulpit did was teach from the >gospels the ways of Christ they would at least be >completing the tenets of the faith. > >In reply to> >A Nation Deceived > >Christianity: Satan’s Deception > >Jodi Mitchell >2006 >A Nation Deceived: Christianity: Satan’s Deception > >Man’s greatest fall is soon to come to pass as the >final days of God’s creation unfolds revealing the >final hours of deception perpetrated upon us by Satan. >Satan, the master of lies, as the Christians today >refer to him, has begun one of the greatest deceptions >ever planned- the one of leading the hearts of the >whole earth away from God, the Father. > And there was war in heaven: Michael and his >angels fought against the dragon; and the > dragon fought and his angels, And prevailed >not; neither was their place found any more in > heaven, And the great dragon was cast out, >that old serpent, called the Devil and Satan, > which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast >out into the earth, and his angels were cast > out with him. (Revelations 12: 7-9 King >James Version) >The Holy Bible also says that Satan would in the last >days deceive even the elect of God, the Father, if it >were possible and there would be a great apostasy. > Having been cast from heaven, Satan began his >greatest deception. How was the serpent to accomplish >the one thing he desired most; to turn the rest of >heaven from God, the Father? He began with the slow >teaching of incorrect history. He blinded the hearts >of men and closed the eyes and ears of those who >remained with God, the Father. The Holy Bible says >that those who have spiritual ears and eyes will see >the truth. > Jesus is the deception that Satan cultivated to >deceive. Research from the Roman Church (The Greatest >English Classic, MCMXII) on how Satan developed his >deception can be found in the most widely accepted >tools--the Holy Bible. Today, there are many versions >of the Holy Bible containing sixty-six books which >most of the Christian world holds as the authority on >God, the Father, and His dealing with mankind. >Christians’ existence has been spent attempting to >make the Holy Bible speak the modern language and in >so doing have lost some of its meaning. Is it a fairy >tale of men’s imaginations or is it the inspired word >of God, the Father? It is both; yet, it is considered >to be authoritative doctrine. > The Roman Church, at the insistence of Constantine in >325 A. D., gathered the Nicene Council together to >organize what was to become the accepted authority on >God, the Father. The result is the Holy Bible which >contained seventy books. Later King James would >authorize the English translation/transliteration of >the Holy Bible. The Holy Bible and what the Church >teaches are partially contradictory to each other. The >Roman Church from which all other Christian churches >have been birthed teaches God incarnate in Jesus. God, >the Father, is taught to have left heaven and become >flesh in Jesus. The church uses the scriptural >reference of John 1:1 in teaching that the Word was >both, God, the Father, and Jesus. The Roman Church and >most of the Christian subparts of the mother church >teach the Trinity or the Godhead; God being >three-in-one, as God, the Father, the Son, and the >Holy Ghost. God, the Father, an invisible power, left >heaven, took the form of man in the body of Jesus, >died, and remained with us as the Holy Ghost (Catholic >Encyclopedia, 2006). > The Holy Bible has several verses which are >misconstrued as a reflection of Jesus referring to >Himself as God, the Father. He speaks to those with >him teaching them they could see God, the Father, in >Him, as He is one with the Father found in John 10:30, >“I and my Father are one.” The works He produced, with >God the Father’s influence, allowed one to see God the >Father. Today it is said that one should so live as to >let others see God, the Father, in their lives, yet >this does not make a person God, the Father, nor did >it make Jesus the Father when He referred to the same >influence. > Now turn to how this great deception came to >fruition. Stepping outside the Holy Bible as >written--outside of church dogma and looking at new >discoveries with the help of archaeology in the >eastern sector of the globe as new writings are >discovered. In 1947 the Dead Seas Scrolls were >discovered. These scrolls were written for the sole >>purpose of being used by their writers and have been >>left unedited or revised; therefore, they are said >>hold the truth. This new work contained greater >>insight into the Jewish wars and Jesus. >> The Dead Sea Scrolls, in the records titled The War >>Scrolls, clearly link Jesus to the wars and the group >>of Judean fighters known as Zealots. The War Scrolls >>brought to light the kittim or the Romans and showed >>the Zealots would die before serving Rome. While >>concurring with Baigent’s research on the Dead Sea >>Scrolls, my research showed the Zealots were not >>fighting only to take back the land; it was a >>religious war in which they wanted to gain control >>over the temple. The high priests during this time in >>history were appointed by Herodian leaders; corrupt >>men who polluted the temple. The Zealots were fighting >>to have the legitimate bloodline of Aaron in the >>priesthood. Jesus was born to this heirship position >>just as He was born to fulfill the Kingship of the >>nation of Israel. The Rule of the Community gives us >>information referring to the priesthood and to the >>king of Israel, as Messiahs of Aaron and Israel. The >>title Messiah of Aaron referred to the priesthood and >>the title Messiah of Israel referred to the king of >>the nation of Israel; and both referred to the >>Messiahs they awaited. The Dead Sea Scrolls provide a >>view of Jesus’ role in both arenas--political and >>religious; however, we must go first and see how they >>were to be played out. >> His birth according to the Gospels in the Holy Bible >>would place him in line for both the Messiahs >>previously mentioned. Jesus was the King of Israel >>through the bloodline of Joseph; Joseph having been a >>direct descendant of David. Jesus, heir to the >>priesthood, was the religious Messiah through Mary; >>Mary having been a direct descendant of Aaron (Mathew >>1:1, 16; Luke 1:5, 36; 2:4). >> Focusing on the dual Messiah, high priest and king, >>(bani mashiach in Hebrew), the Zealots looked for Him >>to lead them to victory; conversely, to accomplish all >>these expectations Jesus knew He had to gain public >>acceptance. Old Testament prophecy lay before Jesus >>and with direct intent to gain their acceptance Jesus >>used those prophecies. He rode into Jerusalem on the >>back of a donkey fulfilling the words of the prophet >>Zachariah; nevertheless, many who were self-appointed >>caretakers of the orthodox story fought with all might >>to act as if Jesus’ acceptance were divinely set. A >>conclusion could be drawn that the fear of the truth >>altering the Gospels, the figure of Jesus, and history >>made those caretakers keep the truth in the background >>and not the foreground of this controversy; yet, later >>at the trial they plainly speak out and say Jesus >>should die by the Jewish law because he had made >>himself the Son of God. >> John 11:56-57 shows a slight hint towards the plan >>Jesus arranged in order to gain the public’s >>admiration. John wrote many people who were in >>Jerusalem for the Passover looked for Jesus >>expectantly as if Jesus would come to the temple >>knowing there were orders for His arrest. Pilate, >>knowing the truth about Jesus, would have made the >>crowds aware as recorded in John 12:12-13. John >>recorded the people heard that Jesus was coming to >>Jerusalem so they took palms and went to greet Him. >> No matter how you choose to look at the scene, Jesus >>entered into Jerusalem deliberately, with full intent >>to do all the right things to have Himself recognized >>as the Messiahs, the anointed one; but herein remained >>another issue--when had He been anointed? Three of the >>Gospels tell of no anointment prior to His coming into >>the city of Jerusalem. If no anointment had taken >>place prior to this point; how then was He the >>Messiahs? John’s Gospel tells Jesus was anointed six >>days prior to the Passover, six days prior to entering >>Jerusalem. Entering the temple and driving out the >>money changers gained him recognition as the Messiahs; >>yet, further recognition came when the lame and the >>blind approached to be healed. The children cried, >>“Hosanna to the Son of David.” Thrice He fulfilled the >>prophecy of the Old Testament as now shown in Psalms >>8:1-2, “your majesty chanted by the mouths of >>children”, and in the words “for Wisdom opened the >>mouths of the dumb and gave speech to the tongues of >>babes” (Wisdom 10:21). When challenged, Jesus used >>these prophecies to refute his challengers. >>The Zealots--so committed to the cause of >>Israel--would rather die than to serve Rome; wars >>raged and many Zealots--with their families--committed >>suicide in order to die pious. Jesus put a twist in >>their zeal by telling them to pay the tax due to Rome >>because it meant nothing; it was not of the kingdom, >>the true kingdom, and the reply of Jesus enraged >>Zealots. The Zealots shouted to release a murderer and >>crucify Jesus as they stood and rejected the >>Messiahs--the Messiahs they had so long awaited. >> By 135 A. D., Hadrian had but one dream; that being >>the annihilation of all Judea (Palestine). Over the >>next two generations Israel gained the right to >>celebrate all of their religious rules or beliefs. All >>this should have made the Israeli history a sure >>thing, with the man Jesus in his rightful place; >>nevertheless, it did not. The Jewish wars raged on >>until 70 A. D. and the temple of Jerusalem lay in >>ruin. >>Reaching a point of clearer understanding of the >>magnitude of the dual role of Jesus, look at His >>crucifixion. The Holy Bible tells us that Pilate >>washed his hands before the people signifying he had >>washed himself free from the responsibility of Jesus’ >>death; still, looking closer note that Pilate, at the >>same time, commanded his soldiers to leave the sign >>King of Kings over the head of the man Jesus (Mathew >>27, 37). Why? Pilate knew the truth of Jesus; and >>Pilate knew absolutely Jesus was the promised >>Messiahs. The birth records and the records of the >>Kings held the truth of Jesus’ lineage. Pilate knew >>Jesus was born to be the true King of the Jews. His >>wife had warned him to not harm the Jesus because she >>had been told in a dream all things concerning Jesus >>(Matthew 27: 19). >>Until the believed crucifixion, Jesus was a Jew. Once >>He was removed from the scene and with no reminders >>due to the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple, a >>manipulation of the history began. A new movement >>formed centered on Jesus rather than on God, the >>Father. Pagan influence of those converted to the >>movement lead to a change from Jew audience to pagan >>(Gentiles as they were known, both Roman and Greek). >>This new movement later became known as Christianity >>when the Jesus of faith emerged from the Jesus of >>history. Jesus of history had spoken of God, the >>Father and delivered a divine message from God, the >>Father; however, He never Himself claimed to be God, >>the Father. >>The world within which Jesus was born and lived was >>the connection between a time when belief was >>everything; and the wrong belief, in the wrong context >>could bring about sudden death; either from the Romans >>via crucifixion or from the Zealots (Sicarii) via >>lethal dagger. Concurring with Baigent, few historical >>events have found their way into the Gospels; yet >>those that did were sanitized, censored, and often >>inverted views of the Roman Church. The Romans had >>done all in their power to expunge all political >>content from what was being written to become the New >>Testament; yet, with all the removal of Jesus of >>history from the work, the most pernicious removal was >>Jesus from his Jewish context. John, the only Gospel >>writer who retained some of the historical Jesus >wrote: >> The Jews fetched stones to stone him, so >>Jesus said to them, ‘I have done many good >> works for you to see…for which of these are >>you stoning me?’ The Jews answered him, >> ‘We are not stoning you for doing a good >>work but for blasphemy: you are only a man >>and you claim to be God.’ Jesus answered, ‘Is it >>written in your Law: I said, you are gods? So the Law >>uses the word gods of those to whom the word of God >>was addressed’ (John 10: 31-35). >>Between the time Jesus spoke these words found in the >>Gospel of John, and the end of the first century A. >>D., Jesus had been made Christian. Being Christian >>meant following rules far removed from those the Jesus >>of history followed--those of Judaism. >>The dialogue between the second-century church father, >>Justin Martyr and a Jewish teacher named Trypho, makes >>a point that those who affirm [Jesus] to have been a >>man, and to have been anointed by election, and then >>to have become Christ, appear to speak to me more >>plausibly. Trypho further challenged Martyr in order >>to prove the point by stating, Answer me then, first, >>how you can show that there is another God besides the >>Maker of all things; and then you will show [further,] >>He submitted to be born of the Virgin (Dods, Reith, >>Pratten, 1867). >>In researching Justin’s writings for several years, my >>own thoughts matched those of Justin; Christ was the >>only important thing in my life and the need to prove >>or disprove His relationship to God, the Father. The >>only important thing to Justin was his belief in >>Christ. It could bring him salvation and it could >>bring salvation to anyone else no matter if they kept >>the Sabbath or were circumcised, or kept any part of >>Judaism. The Jewish law and the Jesus of history had >>now been left far behind (Baigent, 2006). >>In one of the most illuminating and dramatic >>encounters in human history, (Starbird, 1993), Jesus >>said to Pilate: “For this was I born, and for this >>have I come into the world, to bear witness to the >>truth. Everyone who is on the side of truth listens to >>my voice.” Pilate’s reply to this was: “Truth? What is >>that?’’ >> Many picture Jesus as the fair-haired, fair-skinned >>blue-eyed European; nevertheless, this He was not, >>Jesus was a dark-skinned, black-haired, blue-eyed >>Palestinian. Jesus was born when there was no New >>Testament and certainly no Christianity; in fact, >>there were no Christian writings until near the second >>century after Jesus’ assumed crucifixion. Even then >>the Christians had to wait two more centuries before >>there was an agreed upon text. The period of waiting >>for the creation of such a text makes even the most >>devout Christian question the divinity of the New >>Testament. The Jesus Papers research holds: >>To an independent observer, it seems more likely not >>only that the New Testament was deliberately imposed >>upon a god who was actually quite happy with a wide >>expression of teachings, but that it was deliberately >>imposed by a group of people who wished to control the >>divine expression for their own profit and power. >>(Baigent, 2006) >>Today, Christians are not being taught the most >>important parts of religion. They are lead to believe >>the scriptures in the New Testament are the divine >>words of God, and cannot be altered; that they are as >>exact now as when given by God and must not be taken >>any other way except literally. Modern Christians are >>not taught that for one hundred fifty years after >>Jesus that the authoritative writings were still the >>Old Testament. The writers of the original text in the >>New Testament did not set out to create this book. >>They merely wrote history, memoirs, usually for their >>own family. Today, in the Church of Jesus Christ of >>Latter Day Saints (Mormon), members still write >>journals of the religious events such as the visits of >>their prophet to the cities in which they live. These >>memoirs are used in their meetings to reflect on >>things taught by the prophets. They are not gospel any >>more than were the original text of the testaments of >>the Holy Bible. >>Justin Martyr, the second century Christian writer, >>considered the Holy Scriptures to be just mere memoirs >>of the apostles. They were read in religious meetings >>in support of the teachings; but, they were not >>considered authoritative. Most of the works in the New >>Testament were written long after Jesus was gone from >>the scene by men who never met the Jesus of history; >>yet, they became the creators of the Jesus of faith >>(Dods, Reith, Pratten, 1867). >>Look at some crucial questions to which the answer can >>be found by those with spiritual ears and eyes: Did >>Jesus exist at all or was He simply a man of fiction? >>Is there proof outside the teachings of the religious >>institutions? Was He simply modeled after the gods of >>the Greeks and the Romans? The word Jesus is Aramaic >>which meant: Yeshua, Joshua, the Deliverer, or the >>Savior. Jesus could just be a title that this man >>acquired. Christ, from Christos, the Greek translation >>of the Aramaic word, Meshiha, meant the Anointed One; >>yet, there is no record inside the New Testament that >>can be historically sound; therefore, an outside >>source was sought to find a record that might indicate >>the existence of Christ or the Christians. All the >>records of Herod and Pilate were gone; however, in >>Rome were found two records--one from the historian >>Tertullian (c. A. D.160-225) and the other from the >>historian Tacitus (c. A. D. 55-120). Their records >>made mention of the group called Christians. >>Seemingly, there existed Jesus Christos--the >>Messiahs--due to the matter of fact writings of the >>Roman historians as is shown by Baigent in The Jesus >>Papers. >>Many people began making Christianity a centrally >>located, centralized religion of faith. Irenaeus, in >>Against Heresies, clearly knew Gnostics would lead >>away the members from churches which were beginning to >>form. Even with his flawed ideas of religion, Irenaeus >>began organizing the first of the writings which would >>become the New Testament. Baigent, in fact, says >>Irenaeus was the one who created the identity of the >>One Divine God, Jesus, as both the Son and the Eternal >>Creator, who was God, the Father. Over the next three >>centuries, the Jesus of faith took victory over the >>Jesus of history, and by the fifth century the Jesus >>of history had all but disappeared. >>The mythical entwinement of the two figures of Jesus >>later became theologically accepted and justified as >>truth; nonetheless, as with the pagan emperors before >>them, the keepers of the orthodoxy were plagued in >>their mind by heretic thoughts and like the pagan >>emperors they began centuries of campaigns eradicating >>anyone who opposed this new Jesus of faith. >>Inquisitions, Rome’s power in the church, formed and >>were the bearers of death. Baigent (2006) states: >>The historical Messiah had been long forgotten--what >>mattered now was the Vatican’s >>Christ. The pathetically crucified figure became the >>justification of last resort for an exponentially >>increasing number of rules and regulations that >>affected every life and every part of life. >>Little hope remained in turning the Vatican’s position >>which was considered the only path to truth--a path >>built on the quest for power and control--a path >>filled with blood that centered on the figure of a >>mythical Jesus Christ and which bears little relation >>to the Jesus of history who was crucified as a >>political activist--a terrorist--a Zealot by Pontius >>Pilate. >>In today’s arena of religion, The Congregation for the >>Doctrine of the Faith, who are at the very center of >>the Vatican’s command, maintain the same point of view >>as its forefathers--the Inquisition-- to guard the >>Vatican’s secrets and to calm the Vatican’s greatest >>fear of the emergence of the truth, the one evidence >>that would separate the two figures of Jesus, the one >>of faith and the one of history, and show the truth; >>that Jesus was not God, the Father, as the Council of >>Nicaea said but just a man. Baigent concludes that >>Jesus is mere man--totally mortal; yet, it is possible >>He is the Son of God by miraculous birth. The search >>for truth in a world filled with dishonesty and a lack >>of integrity leaves the common-class people little >>hope to distinguish the truth; after all, what is the >>truth? Churches are filled with pastors whose lives >>should be so Christ-like; yet, they are involved in >>the world of gambling, alcoholism, adultery, and child >>abuse. They stand in the pulpits and sing songs to >>Jesus having left far behind God, the Father. What is >>the truth? Is God incarnate in Jesus? Is Jesus only a >>man? Is Jesus the Son of God? The answer can be found >>by looking at the man, born the Son of God, to bring >>us the divine message which God, the Father, sent so >>many times before through His prophets in the Old >>Testament. We failed to follow the words of the >>prophets; and so in one last effort to get us to >>become a loyal nation of God, the Father, God, the >>Father, sent His Son, Yeshua, Joshua, Jesus the >>Christ, to bring the final divine message. >>Christians use the following verses when speaking of >>God in reference to having sent Jesus to earth: >>And it came to pass of those days, as he taught, the >>people in the temple, and preached the gospel, the >>chief priest and the scribes came upon him with the >>elders, And spake unto Him saying, Tell us by what >>authority doest thou these things? … And Jesus said >>unto them Neither tell I you by what authority I do >>these things. Then He began to speak to the people >>this parable; A certain, man planted a vineyard, and >>let it forth to husbandmen, and went into a far >>country for a long time. And at the season he sent a >>servant to the husbandman, that they should give him >>of the fruit of the vineyard: but the husbandman beat >>him and sent him away empty. And again he sent another >>servant: and they beat him also, and entreated him >>shamefully, and sent him away empty. And again he sent >>a third: and they wounded him also, and cast him out. >>Then said the lord of the vineyard, What shall I do: I >>will send my beloved son it may be they will reverence >>him when they see him. But when the husbandmen saw >>him, they reasoned among themselves, saying, This is >>the heir: come, let us kill him, that the inheritance >>be ours. So they cast him out of the vineyard, and >>killed him. What therefore shall the lord of the >>vineyard do unto them? (Luke 20:1-2, 7-15). >>Just as the husbandmen, Christians killed the true >>Jesus, the Jesus of history, the Son of God, and >>created in the Jesus of faith a new God. >>Nevertheless, Satan’s influence did not end here. Rome >>today continues to hide the truth. Archaeologists, >>with modern technology, are discovering the truth; and >>the powers behind Rome, through the Vatican, continue >>to keep the scrolls locked in vaults beneath their >>city to prevent the revealing truth. Baigent >>personally witnesses new scrolls kept secret in fear >>of Rome. The world of Christianity would be shown as >>the false religion--built on lies and secrets. Digs >>show new records of the truth; and this truth leads >>those with spiritual eyes and ears to the one place on >>Earth which seems to hold these records--Egypt. >>The Holy Bible states out of Egypt I will call my Son. >>Why? Jesus did not die at the planned crucifixion. >>New records and the Greek Bible confirm that the >>living body of Jesus of history was taken from the >>cross by Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus and placed >>in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea. Original Greek >>text was written soma, the living body of Jesus of >>history was ask to be removed from the cross, yet >>Pilate replied the ptoma body could be removed; yet >>how could this have been? The Vulgate, the Latin Bible >>translates soma and ptoma of the Greek Bible to only >>one form, corpus, dead body. Herein exist the >>deception by Rome to hide the truth of Jesus of >>history’s survival. The secret was now hidden. How >>could Jesus of history be alive? One of the stories >>told of Pilate in the Holy Bible tells of the dream of >>the wife of Pilate in which she is visited by angels >>who tell her to warn Pilate to not harm Jesus of >>history. Findings tell this story: Pilate helped Jesus >>of history to live by having his soldier drug Him with >>opium and belladonna. The Holy Bible shows the same >>story as Jesus thirsted and so they gave Him vinegar >>to drink (Schonfield, 1977). They did not break His >>legs as was the normal tradition. They pierced His >>side, a spleen maybe, which even at this point in >>history are recorded instances of surgery for such >>injuries. The Holy Bible tells where Joseph and >>Nicodemus took myrrh, used to stop bleeding, and other >>spices to heal Jesus of history. Neither drug was used >>in the embalming of bodies (Mark 16:1; Luke 23:56). >>The Qur’an (Woman 4:155-158)) of the Muslims’ faith, >>Islam, says, “æäÝí >>ÇáÍÞíÞå >>æäØÞ >>ßÐÈå >>ßÈÑí ÖÏ >>ãÇÑí. >>æÇÚáä : >>áÞÏ >>ÇÊÎÐäÇ >>Çáí >>ÇáãæÊ ¡ >>æÇáãÓíÍ >>ÚíÓí ÇÈä >>ãÑíã ¡ >>æÇÈáÓÊáí >>; Çááå. æáã >>íßä ÞÊáå >>¡ æáÇ åÊí >>ÊÕáÈ áå ¡ >>æáßä Çä >>ÝÚáæÇ.” Translated to >>English it states they did not crucify him; they did >>not cause his death on the cross. >> The location of the cross, the tomb, and the Garden >>of Gethsemane are in Kidron Valley. The Holy Bible >>says the crowds were at a distance; was this a private >>execution (Luke23:49)? Had Pilate obeyed the angels? >>Further study of new records indicated Pilate had >>listened to his wife’s pleas and secured Israel’s >>history by saving the Jesus of history--the true King >>of Kings and high priest of the Jewish religion--Lord >>of Lords. Now if all this is true, what then of this >>mere mortal man--Jesus of history? Egypt holds the >>answer, as do France, Italy (Rome), Judea (Palestine) >>and Babylon (Iraq). There are continuing >>archaeological finds due to modern technology that >>shed light on this deception of Satan; fulfilling his >>own angry words, those spoken as he was cast forth >>from God, the Father that he would turn the hearts of >>the whole world from God, the Father. Looking at the >>political arena of the world today--the war in Iraq >>and the increasing wars now in Palestine--one must >>begin to look inward first, then outward, at the >>events and ask: Where do these fit in the search for >>the truth? For now, no answer is exact; yet, the Holy >>Bible says in the last days Jesus of history will >>return, and Satan will lose. The battlegrounds are >>set, the end has been told (Revelations). Now we wait >>and watch as the rest of the truth unfolds. >> >References >> >>Baigent, M. (2006). The Jesus Papers. New York: >>HarperCollins Publishers. >>Baigent, M. Leigh, R. (1991). The Dead Sea Scrolls >>Deception. New York: Touchstone. >>Catholic Encyclopedia. September 5, 2006. >>http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07706b.htm >>Martyr, J. (155 C. E.). The Writings of Justin Martyr >>and Athenagoras, translated. Marcus Dods, >>George Reith, and B.P. Pratten. Edinburgh, 1867. >>McAffee, C. (MCMXII). The Great English Classic: A >>Study of the King James Version of the >>Bible and Its Influence on Life and Literature. New >>York and London: Harper & Brothers >>Publishers. Retrieved August 2006, from e-Books >>database. >>Starbird, M. (1993). The Woman with the Alabaster Jar: >>Mary Magdalen and the Holy Grail. >>Vermont: Bear & Company. >>Vermes, G. (1962). The Dead Sea Scrolls. London: >>Penguin Books Ltd.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.