VoyForums

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:13:54 06/20/09 Sat
Author: Lee
Subject: I agree, SeaBeth. I don't think of DJE as 'cute.' Strikingly handsome is a better description as far as I'm concerned. LOL. However, it wasn't a bad review of "Impact."
In reply to: SeaBeth - who somehow doesn't think of DJE as "cute" 's message, "The New York Times has a review of "Impact." Inside for the link -" on 11:54:31 06/20/09 Sat


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Hmm. Not a horrible review, but not a really good one either. And no, DJE may have been cute 30 years ago, but I think he graduated into the handsome phase a long time ago. -- JAG Junkie (Ronda), 13:16:08 06/20/09 Sat [1]


[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[Edit]

[ VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
 * Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
 * HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

* Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.