Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
|
| Subject: Renard may not be well liked due to the others know she is the front runner. | |
Author: .No way is Sturgil winning. SHe wont be top 5. | [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] Date Posted: 19:40:12 06/29/17 Thu Author Host/IP: c-67-160-70-51.hsd1.wa.comcast.net/67.160.70.51 In reply to: TheCrown 's message, "Re: Which one contestant do you think will be the next Miss Washington?" on 10:56:00 06/29/17 Thu >Renard is a front-runner, but if you notice her >interactions with the other contestants you can tell >she is NOT well liked. It was very apparent at >orientation weekend. I hope she does well but based on >what I saw and what I know, she wouldn't be the best >representative for WA. > >Sturgil thinks she has it in the bag and she might, >but one must wonder if she has the face for the job. > >Smith is definitely someone who would be an >interesting and fun titleholder - is her talent strong >enough to win WA? She'd be killed at MAO with what she >did at the open/sweeper. > >Murphy is stunningly beautiful on stage - no idea what >her interview is like though. > >Abbott is incredible in talent but couldn't win a >local last year so I think her 1RU the year before was >a fluke. > >Springer is a dark horse - she's extremely smart so I >would imagine her interview scores high, if she brings >her A game she could be in the top 5 for sure... > >Ultimately, I think it's going to come down to >Sturgil, Smith, and Renard... [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| [> [> [> Subject: I think maybe top 5 but no win | |
|
Author: Fin [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 20:05:32 06/29/17 Thu Author Host/IP: 66-87-138-177.pools.spcsdns.net/66.87.138.177 >>Renard is a front-runner, but if you notice her >>interactions with the other contestants you can tell >>she is NOT well liked. It was very apparent at >>orientation weekend. I hope she does well but based on >>what I saw and what I know, she wouldn't be the best >>representative for WA. >> >>Sturgil thinks she has it in the bag and she might, >>but one must wonder if she has the face for the job. >> >>Smith is definitely someone who would be an >>interesting and fun titleholder - is her talent strong >>enough to win WA? She'd be killed at MAO with what she >>did at the open/sweeper. >> >>Murphy is stunningly beautiful on stage - no idea what >>her interview is like though. >> >>Abbott is incredible in talent but couldn't win a >>local last year so I think her 1RU the year before was >>a fluke. >> >>Springer is a dark horse - she's extremely smart so I >>would imagine her interview scores high, if she brings >>her A game she could be in the top 5 for sure... >> >>Ultimately, I think it's going to come down to >>Sturgil, Smith, and Renard... [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
| [> [> [> [> Subject: Re:Nope, not Sturgil. | |
|
Author: fan [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 01:39:30 06/30/17 Fri Author Host/IP: NoHost/172.78.208.132 >>>Agreed with Smith and Renard. >>>I agree. Sturgil thinks she is all that but she is just superficial and just pain rude. Try being nice first then being a role model. >>>Renard is a front-runner, but if you notice her >>>interactions with the other contestants you can tell >>>she is NOT well liked. It was very apparent at >>>orientation weekend. I hope she does well but based >on >>>what I saw and what I know, she wouldn't be the best >>>representative for WA. >>> >>>Sturgil thinks she has it in the bag and she might, >>>but one must wonder if she has the face for the job. >>> >>>Smith is definitely someone who would be an >>>interesting and fun titleholder - is her talent >strong >>>enough to win WA? She'd be killed at MAO with what >she >>>did at the open/sweeper. >>> >>>Murphy is stunningly beautiful on stage - no idea >what >>>her interview is like though. >>> >>>Abbott is incredible in talent but couldn't win a >>>local last year so I think her 1RU the year before >was >>>a fluke. >>> >>>Springer is a dark horse - she's extremely smart so I >>>would imagine her interview scores high, if she >brings >>>her A game she could be in the top 5 for sure... >>> >>>Ultimately, I think it's going to come down to >>>Sturgil, Smith, and Renard... [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
| [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Enough, we get the picture...you dont like Gabby "Washington Mom" | |
|
Author: Fan [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 08:38:51 06/30/17 Fri Author Host/IP: 71-212-19-200.tukw.qwest.net/71.212.19.200 >>>>Agreed with Smith and Renard. >>>>I agree. Sturgil thinks she is all that but she is >just superficial and just pain rude. Try being nice >first then being a role model. > >>>>Renard is a front-runner, but if you notice her >>>>interactions with the other contestants you can tell >>>>she is NOT well liked. It was very apparent at >>>>orientation weekend. I hope she does well >>>>what I saw and what I know, she wouldn't be the best >>>>representative for WA. >>>> >>>>Sturgil thinks she has it in the bag and she might, >>>>but one must wonder if she has the face for the >job. >>>> >>>>Smith is definitely someone who would be an >>>>interesting and fun titleholder - is her talent >>strong >>>>enough to win WA? She'd be killed at MAO with what >>she >>>>did at the open/sweeper. >>>> >>>>Murphy is stunningly beautiful on stage - no idea >>what >>>>her interview is like though. >>>> >>>>Abbott is incredible in talent but couldn't win a >>>>local last year so I think her 1RU the year before >>was >>>>a fluke. >>>> >>>>Springer is a dark horse - she's extremely smart so >I >>>>would imagine her interview scores high, if she >>brings >>>>her A game she could be in the top 5 for sure... >>>> >>>>Ultimately, I think it's going to come down to >>>>Sturgil, Smith, and Renard... [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
| [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Oh look, her director is here. Everyone has an opinion on who places. | |
|
Author: Stop tying to censor what others write who will be top 5 [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 05:39:24 07/01/17 Sat Author Host/IP: c-67-160-70-51.hsd1.wa.comcast.net/67.160.70.51 >>>>>Agreed with Smith and Renard. >>>>>I agree. Sturgil thinks she is all that but she is >>just superficial and just pain rude. Try being nice >>first then being a role model. >> >>>>>Renard is a front-runner, but if you notice her >>>>>interactions with the other contestants you can >tell >>>>>she is NOT well liked. It was very apparent at >>>>>orientation weekend. I hope she does well >>>>>what I saw and what I know, she wouldn't be the >best >>>>>representative for WA. >>>>> >>>>>Sturgil thinks she has it in the bag and she might, >>>>>but one must wonder if she has the face for the >>job. >>>>> >>>>>Smith is definitely someone who would be an >>>>>interesting and fun titleholder - is her talent >>>strong >>>>>enough to win WA? She'd be killed at MAO with what >>>she >>>>>did at the open/sweeper. >>>>> >>>>>Murphy is stunningly beautiful on stage - no idea >>>what >>>>>her interview is like though. >>>>> >>>>>Abbott is incredible in talent but couldn't win a >>>>>local last year so I think her 1RU the year before >>>was >>>>>a fluke. >>>>> >>>>>Springer is a dark horse - she's extremely smart so >>I >>>>>would imagine her interview scores high, if she >>>brings >>>>>her A game she could be in the top 5 for sure... >>>>> >>>>>Ultimately, I think it's going to come down to >>>>>Sturgil, Smith, and Renard... [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
|
Forum timezone: GMT-8 VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB: Before posting please read our privacy policy. VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems. Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved. |