Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
><font color=blue><b><center><br> >How Old Do Evolutionists Say the Universe Is? 1 ></font></b></center> >In the late 1920s, evolutionists believed that the >universe was 2 billion years (b.y.) old. Later, >radiometric dating techniques gave much older ages for >certain rocks on Earth (1). Obviously, a part of the >universe cannot be older than the universe itself. >This contradiction was soon removed by devising a >rationale for increasing the age of the universe. > >Similar problems are now widely acknowledged. If a big >bang occurred, it happened 13.7 b.y. ago. If stars >evolved, some stars are 16 b.y. old, such as the stars >in the globular cluster called M13 (2). Obviously, >stars cannot be older than the universe. Also, the >Hubble Space Telescope has found distant galaxies >whose age, based on big bang assumptions, exceeds the >age of the universe (3). > >1. Arthur N. Strahler, </i>Science and Earth >History</i> (Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books, >1987), pp. 102, 129. > >2. Ivan R. King, “Globular Clusters,” <i>Scientific >American, </i>Vol. 252, June 1985, pp. 79–88. > >3. Robert C. Kennicutt Jr., “An Old Galaxy in a Young >Universe,” <i>Nature, </i>Vol. 381, 13 June 1996, pp. >555–556. > >James Dunlop, “A 3.5-Gyr-Old Galaxy at Redshift 1.55,” ><i> Nature, </i>Vol. 381, 13 June 1996, pp. 581–584. > ><a rel=nofollow target=_blank >href="http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ119. >html#wp1573636">http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebo >ok/FAQ119.html#wp1573636</a>

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.