Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
><font color=blue><b><center><br> >How Old Do Evolutionists Say the Universe Is? 4 ></font></b></center> >Evolutionists can undoubtedly resolve these time >contradictions—but at the cost of rejecting some >cherished belief. Perhaps they will accept the >possibility that light traveled much faster in the >past. Measurements exist which support this >revolutionary idea. Maybe they will conclude that the >big bang never occurred, or that heavy elements were >somehow in the first and only generation of stars, or >that stars degrade, but new stars don’t evolve. Much >evidence supports each of these ideas, and all are >consistent with a recent creation. > >Few evolutionists are aware of these contradictions. >However, as more powerful telescopes begin peering >even farther into space, these problems will worsen >and more attention will be focused on them. If >scientists find, as one might expect, even more >distant stars and galaxies with heavy elements, >problems with the claimed age of the universe will no >longer be the secret of a few evolutionists (9). > >9. Dietrick E. Thomsen, “Farthest Galaxy Is Cosmic >Question,” <i>Science News, </i> Vol. 133, 23 April >1988, pp. 262–263. > >M. Mitchell Waldrop, “The Farthest Galaxies: A New >Champion,” <i>Science, </i>Vol. 241, 19 August 1988, >p. 905. > >Dietrick E. Thomsen, “Galaxies in a Primitive State,” ><i>Science News, </i>Vol. 133, 23 January 1988, p. 52. > >M. Mitchell Waldrop, “Pushing Back the Redshift >Limit,” <i>Science, </i>Vol. 239, 12 February 1988, >pp. 727–728. > ><a rel=nofollow target=_blank >href="http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ119. >html#wp1573636">http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebo >ok/FAQ119.html#wp1573636</a>

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.